It looks like England are using ODIs as a way of testing players... Their bowling line up look solid (Topley, Archer, Rashid, Curran), but their batting line up looks veerrrrry fragile and unexperienced.
- Feels like Salt is an explosive T20 player not an ODI player.
- I like Jacks and I hope he can perform well, he's a great batter and a good bowler.
- Cox has played 4 List A matches and averages 24.5 and is England's number 3.
- Bethell is pretty exciting, though he averages 24.9 in List A.
- Dan Mousley has played 9 List A matches (but he averages 37.5)
- And then Livingstone averages 30 in 30 matches. I always feel he must be disappointed with his career. He was one of the bright star when he first played for England and then I feel he never reaaaally reached his potential.
- Sam Curran is "ok", I think he is more a T20 player too (imo he should be England's number 3 or 4 in T20)
- Then Jamie Overton... No idea why he is here... He replaced Jos Buttler, one of the best T20 batter in the world, against Australia, and here he is in the ODI XI ... ? The reason he was there against Australia was because of his strike rate apparently, but is it still as relevant in ODI ?
- Then come the bowlers. But why focus so much on new batters and keep "old" bowlers ?
Are the old bowlers protecting the new batters ? So that the team is not entirely unexperienced ?
Anyway... I'm just readings statistics. I still hope those new players can make an impact and score loooooooots of runs