• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* England Tour of Sri Lanka 2018

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Eh, Dhananjaya de Silva is basically just a batsman who rolls his arm over at this level - 7 wickets in 17 Tests. Three spinners and one quick is a perfectly legitimate balance on an absolute bunsen (assuming that's what they read this pitch as) IMO, especially when your third spinner is an overall much better bowler than who the second quick would be.

England's lineup is weird, but it's always going to be weird with the allrounders they've got I guess. I reckon Curran will be the one who doesn't end up getting much of a bowl (maybe even just one opening spell per new ball), so hopefully he makes it count with the bat. I'd have probably picked two more specialist batsmen than England ended up going with.
Strong-ish argument to be made our all rounders are more likely to score runs than the alleged specialists currently though, I'd say.

Agree it makes the balance look all over the place, but seems little point in playing (say) Denly over Curran, S because he's nominally a batsman.

Better judges than me think Sam will end up a batting all rounder in due course too.

Jennings actually looked very good from what I saw today.
Was about to splutter my indignation at the very suggestion, but his MO does look as if it's slightly more suited to Bunsens than English tracks (readers may want to insert their own "but he's not English" style quip here). Lateral movement isn't Keats's friend.

its almost like you don't have to bat like a ****ing idiot with lots of intent and york yourself to make test match runs.
Who'da thunk it, eh? Kudos to the debutant for grasping this seemingly obvious point in spite of his skipper's example though.

How did Burns look? I've read a lot about his somewhat idiosyncratic technique, but have never actually seen him bat.
 

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
Good score or not. Seen none of it.

Surrey can kiss goodbye to their chances of retaining title, all be in England side.
Yeah, it's quite bittersweet watching them do so well for the national side.
There must have been times when you've known that feeling. I can certainly remember Hoggard, Gough and Vaughan all being on England duty at the same time, maybe Craig White too. More recently Root, Ballance, Lyth and Bairstow maybe? I've probably forgotten someone.
 

91Jmay

International Coach
Yeah, it's quite bittersweet watching them do so well for the national side.
There must have been times when you've known that feeling. I can certainly remember Hoggard, Gough and Vaughan all being on England duty at the same time, maybe Craig White too. More recently Root, Ballance, Lyth and Bairstow maybe? I've probably forgotten someone.
Didn't they have all those + Rashid (who didn't play) on a terrible 2 test tour of the Windies that clashed with the start of the season?
 

Gnske

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
How did Burns look? I've read a lot about his somewhat idiosyncratic technique, but have never actually seen him bat.
It's almost Johnson-esque, it's that ridged and robotic looking, but with far more movements. He's a hard man Rory Burns.
 

flibbertyjibber

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Yeah, it's quite bittersweet watching them do so well for the national side.
There must have been times when you've known that feeling. I can certainly remember Hoggard, Gough and Vaughan all being on England duty at the same time, maybe Craig White too. More recently Root, Ballance, Lyth and Bairstow maybe? I've probably forgotten someone.
Yeah add in Plunkett and Rashid missing large chunks due to ODI stuff then signing Willey and hardly seeing him for the same and it all gets a bit much. The daft thing is you end up struggling against relegation despite having one of the strongest squads on paper as none of the good players are available.
 

Howe_zat

Audio File
Chuffed for Ben Foakes who as people in the thread have noted is bringing us closer to the fabled triumvirate.

As a Surrey wicket-keeper batsman whose name ends in -oakes, he is also fulfilling almost all the current criteria for England selection so it's not surprising that he's been successful. If he can somehow find himself bowling right-arm fast medium and/or be a Curran his place in the side is guaranteed.
 

ajdude

International Coach
can’t wait for anderson to come out and not give a **** about his wicket and foakes to miss out on a ton
 

Groundking

International Debutant
Great score so far to wake up too, Mathews is such a big wicket now. Nice to see all the lads getting involved and being economical, bodes well for the series, and special props to Foakes on getting his ton. JYB to come in at 3, or hell may aswell try opening with him if Jennings continues to stink up the place, for the Windies as a specialist bat?
 

hazsa19

International Regular
I find Root’s captaincy painfully formulaic. Like they decided who would be bowling with what field at this stage regardless of the score.
 

EmJo

Banned
I find Root’s captaincy painfully formulaic. Like they decided who would be bowling with what field at this stage regardless of the score.
Well they'd go with the set field for the batsman and then change accordingly. England have taken themselves out of pressure and will strangle Sri Lanka making them play for runs (meaning bat a little more aggressively and open themselves up for mistakes.
 

Top