No, I didn't "lefted out" the 51 all out. I was describing the "other" performances by your bowlers, in an attempt to show that the 51 wasn't representative.
Whether people think the Freddie catch was out or not it really isn't comparable to claiming a grounded ball, IMO
I can't believe that I've wasted about 30 posts on this tosser when it could have been summed up as efficiently and elegantly as this.
He said 'other' performances.
See the above post for an example from page 1 of the course "Dealing with Pillocks 101"
You still owe me an avatar bet, you snivelling little ****wit.
Sammy2 is worse than bond21 in my opinion. bond21 was a "tool" of the highest order, and he was as much of a cheerleader for his team as Sammy, but he occasionally showed glimpses that he understood the game.
Agreed.
I think it all boils down to the still substantial section of the English public (including knowledgable folk) who still believe England have some sort of god-given right to be the best in the world at whatever we attempt
Anyway, has a team ever been so widely criticised in the process of winning a series as England have here? Bit bizarre how they win a one-day series in the Caribbean and people suggest they're the worst of all the ODI teams or are worse than Bangladesh or the like.
Most of the first posts i made when i joined the site were on the subject of England being overrated, now i'm always saying they're not getting enough credit.
Nah IIRC England have a history of doing well against teams worse than them in ODI cricket just being terrible against the good ones most of the time. Would be surprised if we lost a game against them. We won 3-0 in 03/04 with a team that included Kirtley, Batty, Blackwell and Rikki Clarke (and none of them were even close). We also had no trouble against them in 05 when they beat the Aussies.
