I suspect James didn't expect a wicket with that ballI suspect Chanders didn't deliberately place it in & out of Colly's hands.
I suspect James didn't expect a wicket with that ballI suspect Chanders didn't deliberately place it in & out of Colly's hands.
I bet he did when he saw it heading towards 2nd slip. Perhaps not when he saw where it pitched, tbf. Anyway, enough. Lets see if he can ping Edwards before close of play.I suspect James didn't expect a wicket with that ball
Probably to do with what Khan did yesterday.Haha, what was the umpire doing there? Waiting for the bowler to appeal instead of the fielders or something?
Phenomenal effort from him here on this tour. Credit where credit's due.Broad gifted another tailender.
Probably. Though surely the umpire should get on with their job rather than getting into some petty one-upmanship.Probably to do with what Khan did yesterday.
Though, we could have done with more bowlers able to take tail-ender wickets this tour.Broad gifted another tailender.
Does that really reflect his series to date? I thought he'd taken more top order batters than tailenders.Broad gifted another tailender.
The other thing it calls into major question, if Broad is so good at picking up "cheap tail-end wickets", is why he wasn't given a single over during the last session in Antigua.Though, we could have done with more bowlers able to take tail-ender wickets this tour.
That's an exaggeration, but he's been decent enough. Anyway, that's pretty out, which probably means this referral will see it given n\o.Phenomenal effort from him here on this tour. Credit where credit's due.
What? That's not out.That's an exaggeration, but he's been decent enough. Anyway, that's pretty out, which probably means this referral will see it given n\o.
Reckon it's fairly even TBH. Can remember him getting several tailenders throughout. Nonetheless, as has been pointed-out, we could've done with someone taking one more tailender in a certain game.Does that really reflect his series to date? I thought he'd taken more top order batters than tailenders.
Doesn't look out on the replay.That's an exaggeration, but he's been decent enough. Anyway, that's pretty out, which probably means this referral will see it given n\o.
Crazy stuff, mostly Amjad Khan's doing.74 extras? What the heck? That could've given a lead!