This West Indies team has not gotten talked down for slow over rate as you portray. Anyway, even if they did, that doesn't change the fact that England were horrible.Neil Pickup said:West Indian criticises other country for poor over rate.
Now I've read everything..
Yes, but who is to say that that tape evidence is anywhere near reflecting what actually went on?Richard said:In some cases I've used tape evidence to cross-referance, too. Wherever I can.
And some people will disagree on chances as well, so you can't take one without the other.Richard said:And I'm perfectly well aware of the fact that let-off and saw-off can't be said for certain - but disagreeance is so rare as to make it not to be worried about.
Funny that, but the radio and every report I read of the first session said that it was good bowling from the English...Richard said:Pitch very good for batting, no unevenness perceptible, batting not great;
Again, I'll prefer to respect the views of the experts instead of the most negative man in the World.Richard said:
About as dangerous as he always "looks" I suppose!
And APU he's turned-out as innocuous as he normally does.
Hmm, not what the majority have said about the England bowlers.Richard said:OK, it's not much of an attack,
I suppose he'll have to console himself with the wickets of the 2 top batsmen.chris.hinton said:Great overs by Giles 21 off 2 overs, Marc enjoying flat spin NOW
You definitely under-rate Hoggard.Richard said:Anyone counted the number of rabbits in this game? AFAIK Best doesn't bat at all and is down at eight. Personally, I make it Harmison, Best, Collymore, Edwards, Sanford and, in all essence, Hoggard and Jones.
I suppose he'll have to console himself with the wickets of the 2 top batsmen.Richard said:Giles isn't going to offer a threat to competant batsmen on this wicket, mark my words.
Sounded like an accident to me.Swervy said:first ball to number 11...a beamer..how to get the crowd on your side hey!!!!!!
Giles certainly wasn't bowling flat spin, but he did look somewhat less than Test class today. Not passing judgement though...chris.hinton said:Great overs by Giles 21 off 2 overs, Marc enjoying flat spin NOW
Devon Smith loves English bowling and is in the form of his life right now. He's crossed 50 in each of his last 5 or 6 innings and has scored 4 hundreds in that time with 3 of them over 150.Richard said:'Ey, Liam, I tell you what, this Ryan Hinds isn't a bad player. OK, it's not much of an attack, but he's played nicely so far.
Devon has played beautifully from 11 onwards. Lucky to make it past that, nonetheless.
It was clearly an accident. Harmison held his hand up in apology as soon as he completed his follow through. Edwards thought nothing of it either, as he realized it wasn't intentional. After all, he's done it before (Edwards that is).marc71178 said:Sounded like an accident to me.
Nobody in their right mind would do that nowadays, especially to a number 11.
All stats aside I don't think all of those are bunnies.Originally posted by Richard
Anyone counted the number of rabbits in this game? AFAIK Best doesn't bat at all and is down at eight. Personally, I make it Harmison, Best, Collymore, Edwards, Sanford and, in all essence, Hoggard and Jones.
Giles really did bowl very poorly though Marc. He really never looked like taking a wicket on his own merit, never troubled the batsmen and was gifted both wickets he ended with.marc71178 said:I suppose he'll have to console himself with the wickets of the 2 top batsmen.
The irony is there's been times he's bowled quite well and not got wickets.Mr Mxyzptlk said:Giles really did bowl very poorly though Marc.
Liam as I was just saying to Marc on MSN, I couldn't blieve the change in this guy.Mr Mxyzptlk said:Ryan Hinds I always thought had/has the technique to cope with Test cricket, but I wasn't sure about the mental aspect until today. His future looks bright, but he needs to start converting.