Might have something to do with (finally) having a proper fast fast bowler, rather than millions of fast-medium swingers, losing him due to various injuries, getting him back, and still looking fast and promising.
Let those poms be happy about it!
Gonna happen. And see SA drop Maharaj.SA picked a five-man attack and then got Maharaj to bowl like he would if they had four bowlers.
So yeah I don't think losing a bowler would cause any balance issues at all, unless they also replaced Rabada with Pretorius or something silly.
Yeah it's a really weird gripe. He keeps saying 'what's that spike from then' at the moment the ball hits the pad.Spike is from ball impacting the pad, no controversy here.
Yes, this seems to be the first Test innings in whichGood work. Did anyone with a surname with more than 4 letters take a catch in any of the innings?
It was hard to write but thats what I was implying although the record of 8 with 6 Read catches is a good catch.
Someone like Read or Ames or Bari as keeper is useful though.
Yeah, we seem to have had a few pretty speculative ones off our spinners recentlyThis is a bad review
wtf are youYes, this seems to be the first Test innings in which
- 5 or more catches were held,
- by 3 or more fielders,
- all of whom had surnames with at most 4 letters.
A few near misses:
- 1963 at Christchurch: the only catches in England's first innings were by Dick (2), Reid and Motz.
- 1983 at Julundur: the only catches in India's innings were by Wasim Bari (4) and Wasim Raja.
- 2018 at Cape Town: the only catches in SA's first innings were by Saha (5).
Isn't the point of a forum for people to give their opinions on the game?Stop making outlashing kneejerk statements in tour threads ffs. It's so much worse than you starting threads comparing two random players.