Exactly,think their is a good chance that at least one of Cook or Compton won't be allowed to bat second time around. Does anyone remember the Ashes test when Australia were in slog mode and despite losing five or six wickets, Rogers didn't get a bat.Even if SA bat another 60 overs and get the lead down under 100, England would still be in a pretty decent position to bat a couple of sessions and have a go on day 5. Stokes's speed of scoring really makes a big difference.
Well maybe not the openers, but no reason for Compton to bat next time around especially if he is going to bat like normal.Lead of <200 and England will not change their batting order.
I can't imagine England's seamers fancy another 100 overs in that heat.Another ball not going to hand.
England should enforce a follow-on in the unlikely event of being a possibility. South Africa getting to the 450-500 range is where Cook's premature declaration would really bite. Saves the follow-on and means England would play with a degree of caution getting to around 70-80.
They won't, I recall when they were rolling over india in 2014, and Agnew asking Broad about enforcing the follow on, and he was appalled at the prospect and went on a mini rant about why bowlers hate it. I'd be astounded if he or the rest would have had a change of heart since then especially on this surface.I can't imagine England's seamers fancy another 100 overs in that heat.