dontcloseyoureyes
BARNES OUT
Uh, the one where he tried to slog everything? Yeah all those ones.Scaly piscine said:Which one?
Uh, the one where he tried to slog everything? Yeah all those ones.Scaly piscine said:Which one?
Unlike (seemingly) the majority of idiots on here who take it upon themselves to blame one player or another for the failings of the side, I don't, and never will apart from Rampers (someone to trawl my previous posts for where I have done in 5....4....3....).dontcloseyoureyes said:Don't forget the pinnacle on knuckle-headed-ness, which was Andrew Flitoff's shot.
No, he's got a point. You never seem to be able to give credit where it's due. Pakistan obviously played very well to defend such a modest score.Scaly piscine said:You're so dense it's hilarious... or sad, I'll let you choose.
I believe that was Australia in the 2005 Ashes Series.Scaly piscine said:Oh really they're playing one Test series now are they? Who won the first Test and ended up losing 2-1 again?
I did try to warn him...Jono said:I think it is you sir, who needs to update their assessment on Pakistan. Egg on your face? Maybe wait 5 days next time before making such a criticising comment on a whole cricket team?howardj said:ust goes to show that all these people who say that Pakistan are "unpredictible" (brilliant one day, horrible the next) are so far off the mark, and need to update their assessment. In my view, Pakistan are a pretty ordinary team, who don't have much heart.
Anything short of a 3-0 victory in this series would seem to be a failure, according to most England supporters' pre-series thoughts. And let's see how the next two tests go. As for England throwing the match away rather than Pakistan winning it - England probably wouldn't have been in a position to throw it away had it not been for another enormous stroke of luck. Pakistan had to work hard, especially in their second innings, in order to overcome the Trescothick innings and a poor showing in their first innings.Scaly piscine said:Oh really they're playing one Test series now are they? Who won the first Test and ended up losing 2-1 again?
You don't expect the bowlers to get all the runs do you? I couldn't give a stuff how Pakistan bowled, if England's batsmen had performed anything like what they should have they'd have gotten that target comfortably - so it's pretty obvious who's to blame.FaaipDeOiad said:Oh come on mate. Every person in this thread who's familiar with your posting habits knew that, win or lose, you'd blame the English batsmen if England struggled. You do exactly this every time anything goes against England... belittle the achievements of the opposition while talking up England (or those English players you happen to like) regardless of the circumstances.
Isn't it funny that everyone else recognises that Shoaib and Kaneria were superb, while you blame it all on poor batting?
IT WAS ALL THE UMPIRES FAULT!!!!!!!111!!!shiftone!!![/bitter englishman]luckyeddie said:Unlike (seemingly) the majority of idiots on here who take it upon themselves to blame one player or another for the failings of the side, I don't, and never will apart from Rampers (someone to trawl my previous posts for where I have done in 5....4....3....).
I'm taking the rise out of SP, because he deserves it for being a one-dimensional 'supporter' with no sense of humour.
Regarding this game, my first thought was 'Well played Pakistan', my second was 'What a great game', my third was 'how did we lose that?'
I'm old, I've seen it all before and I hope I'll live to see it all again. I half expected this result - remember yesterday's CW headline - Pakistan in with a shout?
Bull.ClownSymonds said:Anything short of a 3-0 victory in this series would seem to be a failure, according to most England supporters' pre-series thoughts. And let's see how the next two tests go. As for England throwing the match away rather than Pakistan winning it - England probably wouldn't have been in a position to throw it away had it not been for another enormous stroke of luck. Pakistan had to work hard, especially in their second innings, in order to overcome the Trescothick innings and a poor showing in their first innings.
I heard that - but I thought that the chin music was coming next ball. It takes a lot of courage and commitment to produce a slower ball when you've just been biffed for two boundaries.imagine said:waqar younis saw when he was commentating
You know Eddie I never thought it was more than a "squeek".luckyeddie said:Pakistan in with a shout?
Agree...without doubt he's Cricketweb's biggest babyFaaipDeOiad said:Oh come on mate. Every person in this thread who's familiar with your posting habits knew that, win or lose, you'd blame the English batsmen if England struggled. You do exactly this every time anything goes against England... belittle the achievements of the opposition while talking up England (or those English players you happen to like) regardless of the circumstances.
Isn't it funny that everyone else recognises that Shoaib and Kaneria were superb, while you blame it all on poor batting?
"pie"....."chips"......"curry"........"Butt"Neil Pickup said:This interview with Inzy is unreal. It's Urdu with random bits of English thrown in.. "fight back quality" "fighting spirit "positive results" "last day" "one ninety-seven" "pressure"... sounds like an extra in Star Wars...
Seeing as about 5 people quoted your response and just laughed at how pathetic you are, I think you should take a look at the mirror.Scaly piscine said:You're so dense it's hilarious... or sad, I'll let you choose.