• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** England in India

Teja.

Global Moderator
Ishant to bowl full and to the stumps instead of trying to beat the batman bowling length balls outside off.

Beating the batsman 4 times wont give you half a wicket ****.
 

flibbertyjibber

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Trott with the highest strike rate of the match. Who needs KP?

Blocked a few so gone below Swann again now.
 
Last edited:

cnerd123

likes this
Ishant to bowl full and to the stumps instead of trying to beat the batman bowling length balls outside off.

Beating the batsman 4 times wont give you half a wicket ****.
I wonder how Ishant would go as a bowler in an attack full of strong bowlers. A lot has been said about how he doesn't bowl the right length to take wickets, and is only good for building pressure.
If the other bowlers bowling around him did a similar job, would Ishant have more wickets to show for it? Surely a batsmen would be pressured into fishing after one of those tight deliveries and nicking it if he can't get runs at either end?
 

centurymaker

Cricketer Of The Year
I wonder how Ishant would go as a bowler in an attack full of strong bowlers. A lot has been said about how he doesn't bowl the right length to take wickets, and is only good for building pressure.
If the other bowlers bowling around him did a similar job, would Ishant have more wickets to show for it? Surely a batsmen would be pressured into fishing after one of those tight deliveries and nicking it if he can't get runs at either end?
yea good point this.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
I wonder how Ishant would go as a bowler in an attack full of strong bowlers. A lot has been said about how he doesn't bowl the right length to take wickets, and is only good for building pressure.
If the other bowlers bowling around him did a similar job, would Ishant have more wickets to show for it? Surely a batsmen would be pressured into fishing after one of those tight deliveries and nicking it if he can't get runs at either end?
It's a point that's been often made tbf - that Sharma is at best a 3rd seamer, but he's trying to do an attack leader's job.
 

smash84

The Tiger King
It's a point that's been often made tbf - that Sharma is at best a 3rd seamer, but he's trying to do an attack leader's job.
he has always been an awesome 3rd seamer. The only problem is that the 1st seamer is out injured and the 2nd is pretty similar to him
 

Top