smash84
The Tiger King
Lol. Worst ball ever. "Jadeja's mystery ball" sez Nass.
.
Lol. Worst ball ever. "Jadeja's mystery ball" sez Nass.
.
Atherton loves me ftr.Sky comms lying 'cos they hate PEWS too, IMHO.
Na, lying so they can wind up Indian fans later on twitter.Sky comms lying 'cos they hate PEWS too, IMHO.
Well if by hitting they mean DRS-standard hitting then it absolutely was a bad decision and I'll taste it.
It's raining Lenin? Kill me now.We don't even get to see it either. Just taking the sky commies word.
Always been lacking in moral fibre, Athers.Atherton loves me ftr.
I wonder how Ishant would go as a bowler in an attack full of strong bowlers. A lot has been said about how he doesn't bowl the right length to take wickets, and is only good for building pressure.Ishant to bowl full and to the stumps instead of trying to beat the batman bowling length balls outside off.
Beating the batsman 4 times wont give you half a wicket ****.
yea good point this.I wonder how Ishant would go as a bowler in an attack full of strong bowlers. A lot has been said about how he doesn't bowl the right length to take wickets, and is only good for building pressure.
If the other bowlers bowling around him did a similar job, would Ishant have more wickets to show for it? Surely a batsmen would be pressured into fishing after one of those tight deliveries and nicking it if he can't get runs at either end?
It's a possibility, but it's no way worst scenario.still sticking by
150/2 worst case scenario for the day for england.
It's a point that's been often made tbf - that Sharma is at best a 3rd seamer, but he's trying to do an attack leader's job.I wonder how Ishant would go as a bowler in an attack full of strong bowlers. A lot has been said about how he doesn't bowl the right length to take wickets, and is only good for building pressure.
If the other bowlers bowling around him did a similar job, would Ishant have more wickets to show for it? Surely a batsmen would be pressured into fishing after one of those tight deliveries and nicking it if he can't get runs at either end?
he has always been an awesome 3rd seamer. The only problem is that the 1st seamer is out injured and the 2nd is pretty similar to himIt's a point that's been often made tbf - that Sharma is at best a 3rd seamer, but he's trying to do an attack leader's job.
zaheer will be gone by thenTough luck for Ishant then. Maybe somewhere down the line he'll strike it good when Yadav gets up to scratch.