He scored a ton against South Africa didn't he?Well yes, but there's looking weak and then there's looking plain bad. Great batsman can potentially ride out consistent line and length bowling with a bit of nip, Cook really can't.
Didn't say he is as good but I think he has a solid chance to get the Test records (England play a lot more Tests, especially compared to what SRT played in his heyday). Especially if the proposed bilateral four/five test series every other year vs. India comes through .Not to forget tests played as well.
Agree with all that you say, though as good as Cook is he isn't in the same league as SRT to be honest.
Smith or Cook?But IMO he's still very very very good. I'd take him as an opener above almost anyone else in cricket atm.
Oh God, that'll make for awful viewing.Both?
So who else would you have instead?Oh God, that'll make for awful viewing.
They are definitely far and away the best two openers around at the moment. If I was picking a World XI I'd seriously considering making Amla open so I could still fit him in without disturbing the Sanga/Kallis/Clarke/Chanderpaul middle order thing I've got going on, but that "cheaty" option aside you'd be mad to pick a different opener.So who else would you have instead?
They are clearly the top two on the last couple of years evidence. Sehwag was once there but he doesn't appear to be the player he was.
btw Sehwag looks to be awfully unfit. Seems to be on the heavier side.So who else would you have instead?
They are clearly the top two on the last couple of years evidence. Sehwag was once there but he doesn't appear to be the player he was.
If they had a few they might not be so fat.Well no ****
Sehwag's ton in the first test was his first in 2 years, iirc. I haven't really checked the facts, but I've always had the idea that Sehwag is the type of player that makes a really big innings every once in a while, to make up for a few failures and half decent performances. Consistency, though not as important as averages, does matter a bit for an opener.So who else would you have instead?
They are clearly the top two on the last couple of years evidence. Sehwag was once there but he doesn't appear to be the player he was.
I dug up some stats on this on PlanetCricket before the England series:Sehwag's ton in the first test was his first in 2 years, iirc. I haven't really checked the facts, but I've always had the idea that Sehwag is the type of player that makes a really big innings every once in a while, to make up for a few failures and half decent performances. Consistency, though not as important as averages, does matter a bit for an opener.
He's doing quite well for an opener on tracks that suit him. I would consider picking him in a current World squad just to have him open in Asia, maybe replace Smith with him.From 31st August 2010 to 31st August 2012, Sehwag has played 19 Test matches (Aus in Aus, Eng in Eng, RSA in RSA, and WI/NZ at home), and has averaged 37.26 with once century and 10 fifties.
His one century was a mammoth 173, which accounted for 13.65% of the 1267 runs he has scored in that time.
Not too shabby in itself. In India, however, he has averaged 55.25 and has scored his 1 century and 7 of his fifties.
This suggests that while he has be wayyyy below average in playing outside of India in the last 2 years (383 runs in 18 innings @ 21.27 with 3 fifties), selecting him for a series in India is completely justified.
there is no way Sanga or Chanders get ahead of Amla these days.They are definitely far and away the best two openers around at the moment. If I was picking a World XI I'd seriously considering making Amla open so I could still fit him in without disturbing the Sanga/Kallis/Clarke/Chanderpaul middle order thing I've got going on, but that "cheaty" option aside you'd be mad to pick a different opener.
Thank you.welcome.
i really do hope now that england go on to score 620+ and bat india out of the game.