honestbharani
Whatever it takes!!!
Can you link to a quote for that? Seems to me that like your take on how this wicket is playing, that your just making **** up at this point.
Can you link to a quote for that? Seems to me that like your take on how this wicket is playing, that your just making **** up at this point.
I don't hate him. I just hate abilities (or his lack thereof).sledger's hatred of Ben Foakes is strange but consistent
Then as someone who admires and respects hard work how about some more respect for the England backup wicketkeeper yeah?Hey I worked hard to make it so stop pissing on my strawberries.
He is a very handsome man.Then as someone who admires and respects hard work how about some more respect for the England backup wicketkeeper yeah?
You know baiting is a reportable offence
He looks like a donkey with plagiocephalyHe is a very handsome man.
To you, maybe.He looks like a donkey with plagiocephaly
What does he look like to you and what does that do for you?To you, maybe.
Biden's vote count in the 2020 election visualised
EDIT : for clarity I didn't mean debating Jones vs Read, for those didn't realise/pick up on that, I meant that debate - batsman-keeper vs supposed infallible keeperI don't hate him. I just hate abilities (or his lack thereof).
Yeah I'm not making my comments in the context of any wider debate tbh. I just think he's rubbish.back to the old "Jones vs Read" debate, Bairstow may not be the solution but the theory of "catch everything" is flawed given not all catches go to the keeper, Foakes is not flawless himself, AND if you don't have runs on the board then how good the keeper is/isn't is rendered moot...
I hate overhyped so any animosity to Foakes is a reaction to idiotic fawning over him for something unproven to make a difference one way or the other. England won ONE Test and that was because Pope made a big hundred after being dropped on was it 104 (?) Foakes may or may not have helped take the wickets to win BUT without Pope and those crucial runs his relevance in the "who keeps?" debate would be 0-3
a lot of verbal diarrhoea to support a **** Bairstow that has only 3 years of good batting output and will likely be the worst cricketer in the 100 test club when he gets thereback to the old "Jones vs Read" debate, Bairstow may not be the solution but the theory of "catch everything" is flawed given not all catches go to the keeper, Foakes is not flawless himself, AND if you don't have runs on the board then how good the keeper is/isn't is rendered moot...
I hate overhyped so any animosity to Foakes is a reaction to idiotic fawning over him for something unproven to make a difference one way or the other. England won ONE Test and that was because Pope made a big hundred after being dropped on was it 104 (?) Foakes may or may not have helped take the wickets to win BUT without Pope and those crucial runs his relevance in the "who keeps?" debate would be 0-3
Three overturned decisions today, although the earlier 2 made more sense. This one he just seemed pressured by the appeal (not for the first time).That's an utter joke from Dharmasena
Was missing leg anyway even without the edge.