benchmark00
Request Your Custom Title Now!
I don't see how drs enhances the watching of the game, I really don't.
eh? you're a smart guy. if there was no upstairs to go to, it would have stayed not out. and there was no upstairs in 1984.All of it. Well, apart from the 'human error' bit, that bit is true.
It cuts ****ty umpiring decisions?I don't see how drs enhances the watching of the game, I really don't.
nah nah nah **** me you ding bat. I'm talking about McKay in Adelaide, when it was not out on field, went upstairs and they gave it out even though he'd not hit the ballWhat the **** is this logic, seriously? He gave it out because he didn't see the inside edge. That has nothing to do with technology or otherwise, especially since the technology was completely irrelevant in this situation
memory really isn't my strong suit, but I can seem to remember another like McKay's decision where a decision was overturned incorrectly in favour of the fielding team.It cuts ****ty umpiring decisions?
The only time when we see UDRS failing is when captains use it incorrectly. How many incorrect decisions has UDRS got wrong?
I'm not going to pretend that didn't hurt but I will forgive you****test post of the thread, for mine.
It might be time for Australia to play India so your memory can be refreshed.I don't see how drs enhances the watching of the game, I really don't.
India acts exactly as they have done for the last, nearly, couple of decades - acting the bullyChrist, what a world where Giles Clarke is suddenly the good guy.
Shameful lack of genitalia from the other boards tho. Piss weak stuff.
****ing ridiculous from the BCCI. Really annoying. Sick of their ****.BCCI's latest strategy to avoid a repeat of the England and Australia tour drubbings:
ICC news : India threaten pull-out over DRS | Cricket News | Cricinfo ICC Site | ESPN Cricinfo
On a more serious note please GTFO of cricket.
Fraught with danger if not timed properly, don't forget that Riggins.i thought pulling out was generally seen as the best option?