• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** DRS discussion thread

UDRS?

  • Total voters
    138
Cevno

Cevno

Hall of Fame Member
GeraintIsMyHero said:
Erm, not every member is being accused.

Certain members who actually are Precam multis might have had the odd pun thrown their way. But then, that's their own fault for being multis, isn't it?
Click to expand...
Do not want to derail this thread but -

GeraintIsMyHero said:
Edit - I know you weren't, btw centurymaker, just pre-empting before Cevno or some Precam multi brings up his average of 80 or whatever it was in the Ashes
Click to expand...
PhoenixFire said:
:laugh:

Pretty sure they're all just the same person anyway.
Click to expand...
PhoenixFire said:
Let's Cevno more accusations please Corrin.

You've got to say that one out loud for it work.
Click to expand...
There have been many more as well involving other members where there names have been fit into trying to make it look clever posts etc...
And how can you be sure about any member being a Multi or not in any case? :unsure:
 
GIMH

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
I said 'Cevno or some Precam multi'

i.e. I don't think you are a Precam multi

Morris was just joking I think, I don't think he thinks you are either.

The other guys puns were all completely accurate. I am certain of this. But I'm not going into detail because of all the grief I got when (correctly) accusing Sir Alex all through last summer.

Suffice to say it was a Precam multi who left messages on my wall regarding my daughter so you'll forgive me for not being a fan of this person in there dozens of guises.
 
Cevno

Cevno

Hall of Fame Member
Actually there were some pretty colourful and even Racist messages left on my wall as well during that time period by the same guy ,i think.

Most probably,he disguised them as if it was someone else leaving those messages to try and frame someone.
 
GIMH

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
No, I know which user it was who was leaving the messages because I was informed by the mods due to the nature of the messages I was left.

I also happen to know that that user (who is banned) is one of Precam's multis.

I do apologise if you thought I was implying you were one though. Can see why my psot gave you that impression even though that wasn't what I was getting at.
 
Bun

Bun

Banned
lol gimh, that sounds really like a love story between you two. please feel free to share with me in my vm. I can be quite a shoulder to cry on, so my friends say.

trying in vain I hope not, to bring this thread back to topic, I believe that holding was spot on in his assessment regarding the predictive path. I hope babucci will have the tubelights to implement atleast the mat so that obviously painful errors like ball pitching outside leg etc are brought to attnention and rectified.
 
Furball

Furball

Evil Scotsman
Cevno said:
Actually there were some pretty colourful and even Racist messages left on my wall as well during that time period by the same guy ,i think.

Most probably,he disguised them as if it was someone else leaving those messages to try and frame someone.
Click to expand...
Can confirm what GIMH has said with regard to said person's identity.
 
Howe_zat

Howe_zat

Audio File
Sigh. Once again we have, "90% is better than 98% because the latter isn't 100%." And this time it's almost word for word.
 
Cevno

Cevno

Hall of Fame Member
Howe_zat said:
Sigh. Once again we have, "90% is better than 98% because the latter isn't 100%." And this time it's almost word for word.
Click to expand...
What you are saying is fair with regards to the Whole system.
But there is no guarantee at all of any kind, that the predictive path of the ball tracking is as accurate to anything ,let alone more regarding marginal decisions specially.
In face one of the makers is admitting as such. There needs to be this distinction made.
 
Bun

Bun

Banned
BoyBrumby said:
You don't get to be chairman of any company, much less KPMG without knowing which arses to pucker up to.

"Money man sides with the money" non-shocker.
Click to expand...
8-) You know, everyone need not fit in to your stereotype when it comes to heads of corporate honchos. There are plenty of them out there who have come up due to in no small scale their integrity and hard work. And just because they happen to disagree with you doesn't make them money hungry really.

Sorry, mate I respect you very much, but that's a pretty poor post.
 
BoyBrumby

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Bun said:
8-) You know, everyone need not fit in to your stereotype when it comes to heads of corporate honchos. There are plenty of them out there who have come up due to in no small scale their integrity and hard work. And just because they happen to disagree with you doesn't make them money hungry really.

Sorry, mate I respect you very much, but that's a pretty poor post.
Click to expand...
Praise from Caesar.
 
Top_Cat

Top_Cat

Request Your Custom Title Now!
He's right, the BCCI is right that the system isn't fool-proof. This is a separate issue from whether UDRS should be used, though.
 
Last edited:
Jacknife

Jacknife

International Captain
I would have thought, most fans and even players after this series, would have come to the conclusion that this hybrid UDRS has not worked and if your going to use technology use it all.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top