Armstrong is about 1 1/2 batting levels behind Gray, 5 concentration levels better, better keeping and better keeping secondaries. Armstrong is better if you look at it objectively.nibbs said:tbh, if I could have Gray and Armstrong on my team, I'd prefer Gray
Hey? Gray has superb batting, 3-4 weeks from quality, and proficient keeping - and, if I read your post right, Armstrong has proficient batting, 1 week from strong, and respectable keeping, 3-4 weeks from proficient.Scaly piscine said:Armstrong is about 1 1/2 batting levels behind Gray, 5 concentration levels better, better keeping and better keeping secondaries. Armstrong is better if you look at it objectively.
If you think that then he's obviously not 2 levels better. My guy is already overdue for a batting pop and will almost certainly pop next week. So he's basically 8.95...ish batting. Whereas your guy is about 10.5 in batting... 1 and half levels difference.batting is maybe 2-3 weeks from Quality... (10 weeks with 1 net for a 19yo).
If it's 13-14 weeks with 1 net, and Gray has had 10 weeks of 1 net, how is he 10.5? 10 + 10/13.5 comes closer to 10.75 for mine. And fair enough on the keeping call, like I said, Armstrong is the better keeper (and by a bit more than previously thought).Scaly piscine said:If you think that then he's obviously not 2 levels better. My guy is already overdue for a batting pop and will almost certainly pop next week. So he's basically 8.95...ish batting. Whereas your guy is about 10.5 in batting... 1 and half levels difference.
I forgot to mention my guy is highish proficient keeping now not respectable.
1. David Armstrong - 19 yo, BT Rating=67,111
RH Batsman, RH Spin Bowler, superb batting form, superb bowling form, energetic
A cautious player with worthless leadership skills and woeful experience.
Stamina: competent Wicket Keeping: proficient
Batting: proficient Concentration: exquisite
Bowling: abysmal Consistency: proficient
Fielding: mediocre
Not if he's that bad you can't, no.AussieDominance said:can i chuck my guy in for the future
lolmarc71178 said:Not if he's that bad you can't, no.
Oh right, it was obviously my fault then. Your pride, Scaly, is a bitter thing to swallow, but you're all the better for it...Scaly piscine said:Oh right "10 weeks with 1 net for a 19yo" is supposed to mean "he's had 10 weeks with 1 net as a 19yo".
I really don't mind who you'd rather in the team, it's just never realised you cared so much about my thoughts on the composition of the team. You think Armstrong is better? That's lovely, but other people judge players using different criteria, and there is no way you can conclusively say that "Armstrong is better than Gray" or "Gray is better than Armstrong" (or "more suited to this team" or whatever you will).In that case I'd have the batting about equal, but Armstrong is comfortably a better keeper and the stamina difference is small and doesn't effect anything at number 6 anyway.
That's right.Robertinho said:Oh right, it was obviously my fault then.
I don't care, I'm just stating facts from the way I see it. They're both relatively crap compared to the rest of the team anyway.Robertinho said:I really don't mind who you'd rather in the team, it's just never realised you cared so much about my thoughts on the composition of the team. You think Armstrong is better? That's lovely, but other people judge players using different criteria, and there is no way you can conclusively say that "Armstrong is better than Gray" or "Gray is better than Armstrong" (or "more suited to this team" or whatever you will).
marc71178 said:Not if he's that bad you can't, no.