Unlike most years, I kind of nailed it as Corach Rambler (8-1) beats Vanillier (20-1).Grand National this weekend, is there any interest in this race elsewhere in the world? FWIW I've long been thinking Vanillier was perfect for this race and at 20-1 is still a decent price. Mr Incredible is also among my e/w fancies. But if it avoids trouble, Corach Rambler is going to be very hard to beat.
I've been in two minds about the National and national hunt racing for some time. You are right that horse racing for the most part takes great care of the horses, they are prize assets overall, and it's not as grim as the genetic abnormalities that are apparently essential to dog breeding. However, I feel that while the safety measures have improved, horse deaths (and jockey injuries) should be seen as something that should be 0, not treated as unavoidable but regular tragedies. Whatever measures are needed to make that happen, even if it shrinks the jumps right down and shortens the races, need to happen.Unlike most years, I kind of nailed it as Corach Rambler (8-1) beats Vanillier (20-1).
But the race has sparked massive controversy again as sadly Hill Sixteen died at the first fence. My daughter owns two ponies, it led to a very difficult conversation over dinner regarding the rights and wrongs of Horse Racing. I love the sport, and I know that horses are kept in wonderful condition, but that doesn't wash with her (or her mother).
I'm still of the belief that animal protesters should be looking far more into places where animals are properly being harmed, not the world of Horse Racing where they have fulfilled lives.
In the first 6 years after the fences were modified, there no were fatalities. But there's been 5 in the last 4 years.I've been in two minds about the National and national hunt racing for some time. You are right that horse racing for the most part takes great care of the horses, they are prize assets overall, and it's not as grim as the genetic abnormalities that are apparently essential to dog breeding. However, I feel that while the safety measures have improved, horse deaths (and jockey injuries) should be seen as something that should be 0, not treated as unavoidable but regular tragedies. Whatever measures are needed to make that happen, even if it shrinks the jumps right down and shortens the races, need to happen.
Yes, a smaller field would probably help. I'm no fan of flat either! It's a sport that exists purely for gambling.In the first 6 years after the fences were modified, there no were fatalities. But there's been 5 in the last 4 years.
In my opinion, shrinking the jumps will only increase danger as horses jump at greater speed. The horse who died yesterday had previously jumped round Aintree a number of times. So what changed? I think there's an argument for reducing the field size to maybe 30. It seems most fatalities happen early in the race when horses are travelling at more speed and are often short of room. As the field thins out, there seems to be less incident. Even for a hardened Racing fan like me, the first circuit yesterday was a tough watch.
But we should remember that injuries happen in all sports, it is just unfortunate with horses that a broken leg normally means they cannot be saved.
BTW, you'd probably have more issue with Flat racing as a whole than National Hunt. The jump horses have longer careers (they often don't start racing until they're 5) and are generally of more use outside Racing after their careers. They are owned a lot more by ordinary people rather than those simply running a business.
This is not the case in NZ (and to a lesser extent, Australia). Ed has been a part-owner in a group 2 winner in NZ, and two of NZ's best mares recently - Melody Belle (13 Group 1 wins, off the top of my head) and Avantage - were both owned by syndicates with plenty of regular folk in the ownership.Big flat races are very very rarely won by the kind of syndicates you or I would be involved in.
You're always going to get the odd freak that bucks the breeding trends, but the opportunities in the UK of even hoovering up one of these is pretty remote. We've just had our Guineas Trials here, we do at least have a couple of different owners with fancied fillies for the 1,000 even if one is a very rich English Aristocrat and the other a multi-millionaire Iranian Football agent!!Another great example is Pennyweka, who won the NZ Oaks last month and the Australian Oaks a couple of weeks ago.
I doubt she would have made $10,000 in the sale ring, based on her unimpressive pedigree and conformation (shows how much us 'experts' know), but she's now earned well over $1 million for an ownership syndicate of more than 70 people.
It appears she does after another win last night.Shame you didn't jump in on this one, th. Sounds like she has a bright future.
Correct. I went in for a little nibble (pun fully intended) this morning.Also, I hear we may how have the first true CW horse who’ll actually get to the races with all 3 renowned posting legends in the ownership group…