Is there really anything more potentially misleading in cricket than bowling statistics based a small sample of one day matches over a short period a couple of months ago? It has all the ingredients of meaning **** all.The argument his Ryobi Cup form wasn't good is a fair call, however anyone who watched him bowl could comfortably see he was doing ok.
taste it bitchAnd Clint McKay has done **** all this year. Just fortunate we've got a gooch load of injuries.
You don't.oh dear, how am i ever going to recover.
You can't judge a man on one test though, that's ridiculous.Have no problem with him in ODIs
He looked out of his depth in that Test he played however
To be fair I don't believe McKay ever had the potential to be a great Test bowler.You can't judge a man on one test though, that's ridiculous.
Given his age when he played (he wasn't a greenhorn kid) plus his moderate FC record, yes I was in a position to judgeYou can't judge a man on one test though, that's ridiculous.
Should use him as a death bowler.this is all set up for doherty to take 4 wickets through arm ball yorkers. ffs.
wasn't his average like 25 at the time. after like 30 games.Given his age when he played (he wasn't a greenhorn kid) plus his moderate FC record, yes I was in a position to judge
nahwasn't his average like 25 at the time. after like 30 games.
hell it's like 25 now
Indeed.
Haha yeah it was; he had a great (albeit short-term-ish) record.wasn't his average like 25 at the time. after like 30 games.
hell it's like 25 now
At the time of his selection, McKay would have been one of the few pace bowlers to average in the 20's. Deserved his shot at the time, and he remains a nice backup to have in almost a third choice bowling unit.wasn't his average like 25 at the time. after like 30 games.
hell it's like 25 now
Nah; if he plays another Test we have serious issues. But his FC record at the time was fine.Oh ok, so we all agree that McKay's a bluechip Test player