toucheOh, right. Fair enough then. Forth loss in five games, anyway...
toucheOh, right. Fair enough then. Forth loss in five games, anyway...
I was too slow postingYes it has been said Fiery
oh god...he bowls half volleys.. if not its half trackers..Watson will come good. Don't you worry about Watson.
His bowling has been pathetic since he came back from injury. But he bowled so well last year that you can't really ignore it - he averaged under 20. Can't really say he was any worse than Johnson today either - in fact I think he bowled quite decently today, just didn't get any movement.oh god...he bowls half volleys.. if not its half trackers..
as a batsman hes not that bad... but wouldn't make the aussie team in batting for sure..
i prolly prefer Voges bowling than Watto :S :S
Bat him up the order where he should of been and he will do good. Haddin is more suited to where Watson was batting.i agree, but i never believe in Watson in the first place
like i said its my team not what i think it wil be
Watson is ****
yea true in the CT he was good.. but i think that came down to the other 4 fast bowlers bowling brilliantly and the batsmen really targetted Watto and sometimes didnt pay off...His bowling has been pathetic since he came back from injury. But he bowled so well last year that you can't really ignore it - he averaged under 20. Can't really say he was any worse than Johnson today either - in fact I think he bowled quite decently today, just didn't get any movement.
At the moment yes, because Watson is in horrible form. But in general, there's no way in hell that's even close to being true.Symo's bowling >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> watttttttto atm anyway....
Hit the deck bowlers tend to get some seam movement though, Watson included. No swing or anything, but movement off the pitch in bowler-friendly conditions. Like Oram today. Watson didn't get that today and I don't even really know why - his seam position looked quite good on a number of occassions.Prince watson never gets any movement he is basically a hit the deck sort of a bowler.
Yeah, and? That's what always happens in ODIs - batsmen target bowlers and if the bowlers are good enough, they get the batsmen out. It's not like Watson went at astronomical run rates either - IIRC he went at under 4.5. So it was just good bowling really.yea true in the CT he was good.. but i think that came down to the other 4 fast bowlers bowling brilliantly and the batsmen really targetted Watto and sometimes didnt pay off...
oh god...he bowls half volleys.. if not its half trackers..
as a batsman hes not that bad... but wouldn't make the aussie team in batting for sure..
i prolly prefer Voges bowling than Watto :S :S
Let me know when Voges or Symonds averages under 20 with the ball for a whole year will you? It wasn't just the CT btw, in fact Watson bowled better in the DLF Cup than in the CT. He's also got a much better career record than Symonds does with the ball, and that's despite being a much worse bowler than he is now for most of his career.yea true in the CT he was good.. but i think that came down to the other 4 fast bowlers bowling brilliantly and the batsmen really targetted Watto and sometimes didnt pay off...
in saying that i remember he got Gayle out with one that seamed away...
Symo's bowling >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> watttttttto atm anyway....
key word was at the moment..Let me know when Voges or Symonds averages under 20 with the ball for a whole year will you? It wasn't just the CT btw, in fact Watson bowled better in the DLF Cup than in the CT. He's also got a much better career record than Symonds does with the ball, and that's despite being a much worse bowler than he is now for most of his career.
Think you'll find that those are more than one word.key word was at the moment..
At the moment, I reckon Symonds's bowling would be pretty dire, considering he has an arm injury and all.key word was at the moment..
Even though Watson's record is clearly better than Symonds's? God.id ALWAYS give Symo the ball rather to Watto if we were under pressure in a situation... like we needed to keep it tight
Watson all the way.Watson will come good. Don't you worry about Watson.
Haha, well done.Watson all the way.