nope. team that bats second goes first. they really should be a choice though. captain who won the toss should get to pick again (so the sixers still would have batted first).did they get a choice?
you could also go with the boundary tiebreaker, if you don't want to give the a 50/50 coin toss too much powernope. team that bats second goes first. they really should be a choice though. captain who won the toss should get to pick again (so the sixers still would have batted first).
..reminder that dan smith missed a run out that got perth a run last ball of their innings
Yeah, couldn't agree more. I've got no issue with it being used as a tiebreaker in a knockout match, but there's no reason we can't just cop a tie in a league game.Super Overs are dumb (for regular fixture matches).
To be fair he arguably is good enough to play for his international team in T20 cricket; they just don't pick him.Expecting a Pakistani not even good enough to play for his international team to field is asking a bit much.
Yes FTR.Turner is Cribb's boi, isn't he?
I definitely like Maxwell more than the average CW member so I'm happy enough to wear it, but he probably wouldn't make a list of my 50 favourite current cricketers; Turner would make the top five.Thought Maxwell was your boi.