Wide-friendly?I looked at the FC stats of some of Bangladesh's players. I can't work out whether their domestic competition is batting friendly or bowler friendly. All their batsmen average in the mid 30s-early 40s and their bowlers around 29-30.
It's pretty batting friendly as a general rule; they just don't tend to pick the batsmen who score lots of runs in it.I looked at the FC stats of some of Bangladesh's players. I can't work out whether their domestic competition is batting friendly or bowler friendly. All their batsmen average in the mid 30s-early 40s and their bowlers around 29-30.
I'd absolutely love to see him get a shot at Tests.Tushar Imran, now there's a name I haven't heard in a while
That just seems blatantly absurd logic from the selectors that Tushar could have a career like that. I too would absolutely love to see him get a chance, but the odds do seem pretty remoteI'd absolutely love to see him get a shot at Tests.
It's a really weird scenario where the selectors are basically saying "when you were a kid we thought you were going to be gun, so even though you hadn't scored heaps of runs in domestic cricket and were terribad in 50 over cricket we picked you in a bunch of ODIs, and you failed in those, so now we have no faith in your ability to to average 30 in Tests even though you've consistently been the first FC batsman in the country for a decade".
If they gave him a couple of series and he failed then fine, but he's only played five Tests, and only two in the last 15 years. Abolsutely none in the last 12, which is pretty crazy for someone who has not only dominated their domestic setup but also someone who they actually expected to be one of their best ever batsmen at one point. Their whole selection philosophy is pretty whack for batsmen IMO. Their domestic competition is less worthless than they think at this point.