OverratedSanity
Request Your Custom Title Now!
lolI have teeny tiny hopes for England just because I think our swing bowlers are decent now. But maybe they will all collectively break down in the first test.
lolI have teeny tiny hopes for England just because I think our swing bowlers are decent now. But maybe they will all collectively break down in the first test.
But it hasn't been so right? SA won in 2012. SL won in 2014. NZ drew in 2015. Pak in 2016. Plus even the series England wins they always drop matches.Sub continent side winning against sub continent side away isn't as big of a deal tbh. It's winning when the conditions are alien that is the test. I'd expect us to beat anyone at home. On the flip side.
Don't rate Shami?We basically have Bhuvi. Can't see Ishant and Umesh going well there over 5 matches.
They'll all be injured and we'll SOS RP Singh because he bowled well there in 1985Don't rate Shami?
LOL completely forgot about himDon't rate Shami?
Also hard because can't see a county being interested much. Although Shami should find a place somewhere if he commits.One of these guys should follow Zaheer's lead and spend a county season over there. Harder now with IPL in that time of the year.
Wow that's a shock to me tbh.Why so?
- Before the series win in 2015, India had beaten SL in SL only once, back in 1993. Despite having our best team ever over the next 20 years, we never beat them there.
- Sri Lanka have never beaten India in India
- India have beaten Pakistan only once in Pakistan
- Pakistan have beaten India only once in India, back in 1986
Weirdly, Pakistan and SL have beaten each other a bunch of times in their opposing conditions.
Still, if conditions were that similar, you'd expect some more away victories. I'm not saying there aren't similarities in these conditions. There are. But the 3 countries+Bangladesh are hardly homogenous. There's enough of a challenge there for the away team to overcome to make it a considerably big achievement.
There have been similarities in conditions among other countries as well, like certain pitches in Aus/SA and SA/England. But they're never conveniently lumped together into one big amorphous blob like the SC countries. It's a little unfair imo.
A poor lbw decision was the only thing that masked how bad this track was. If Kohli had reviewed and continued, a 300 or even a 400 was his for the taking. This road only produced a result due to Ban batsmen's incompetence.Was the wicket really as bad as people are claiming? I mean sure India scored a lot for a little but they are playing in India with Kohli in the top form of his life.
If one was to solely go by Bangla's performance this would be called a fairly balanced wicket. Even within the match there was enough help for Taskin and the India quicks, and it's not as if any of the spinners got destroyed, Mehendi/Ashwin/Jadeja all ended up with credible figures, exactly why are we calling this a bad wicket?