1. I think he's the long-term 3, but he could play top-order if possible, 3. Probably too sameish to Rogers, and unless he scores 1000+ runs I think his time is up. Besides, the quickness of him being dropped as soon as Lehmann took over is not a positive sign for his future, 4. Surely the former?Ok guys, you have 3 hours to complete the assignment below:
- Burns fans - do you see him as a realistic chance of taking over Rogers spot at the top of the order, or do you see him more of a number 3-5 batsman?
- Tassie batting order, yeah my initial reaction to Hilf at 8 was that he was too high, but in a 4-day match and up against the opposition bowling attack, I don't actually mind it*.
- Thoughts on Ed Cowan and his chances back with the Aussie team? He has been batting at a far better clip this year, which seems to be working for him.
- Peter Handscomb, injured/didn't want to play or was he dropped for Christian/Finch?
*this ain't even a question, just agree with me and I'll be happy.
Yes, played a Second XI match with Jackson Bird a couple of weeks back. Wasn't really successful though.Has Butterworth returned at any level of cricket yet? He was supposed to be back in time for the first Shield game; that's over a month ago now.
I always expected Hughes to eventually cement the second openers slot and had Burns batting at 3. With Hughes gone though and most of the other opening options either getting on in age and not that great (Cowan, Cosgrove) or young and not really there yet (Maddinson, Bancroft, Silk) I could see him getting the gig over Rogers. I doubt the selectors will drop Rogers unless he fails for the first 3 Tests though (would give him an MCG send off if so). A debut at Sydney and the Test series against the West Indies would be a decent run for him to try establish his place in the side before the Ashes.- Burns fans - do you see him as a realistic chance of taking over Rogers spot at the top of the order, or do you see him more of a number 3-5 batsman?
1. Very much so, although CA are probably more likely to go with S.Darsh or Cowan opening again, Burns seems more a middle order guy anyway. He's got a better chance at the end of 2015 where hopefully someone gets Watto to euthanize himself.Ok guys, you have 3 hours to complete the assignment below:
- Burns fans - do you see him as a realistic chance of taking over Rogers spot at the top of the order, or do you see him more of a number 3-5 batsman?
- Tassie batting order, yeah my initial reaction to Hilf at 8 was that he was too high, but in a 4-day match and up against the opposition bowling attack, I don't actually mind it*.
- Thoughts on Ed Cowan and his chances back with the Aussie team? He has been batting at a far better clip this year, which seems to be working for him.
- Peter Handscomb, injured/didn't want to play or was he dropped for Christian/Finch?
*this ain't even a question, just agree with me and I'll be happy.
Loves itProbably explains why Lawford is playing (though it's genuinely offensive that he is). Perfect week for it to happen with the test match on I guess as I won't have to sit through his offensive cricket.
On a scale of one to ten, how much on the outside is he with Berry?Never seen someone so uninterested in being on a cricket field as mcdonald on the weekend.