Could really **** you when it matters the most though.When you all decide to basically go from ball 1 sub 200 scores can happen occasionally, doesn't worry me in the slightest. Aus bowled well up front as well - batted poorly yet again though.
Balance of probability, most 300+ scores by a distance last 2 years. Plodding along in ODI on the off chance you lose wickets in a knockout game in 12 months is daft.Could really **** you when it matters the most though.
That was brilliant. Idiotic stuff from Paine, there was an easy 2 there. Cummo was literally standing mid pitch for a good few seconds just saying "why the **** are't you running???"I liked when Cummins was literally looking at Paine and wondering why he wasn't running
It is better to die fighting than to live on your knees.Could really **** you when it matters the most though.
Viv and Paul Collingwood have done it.Will be awesome if Woakes makes a hundred and then takes 5 wickets for good measure. Has that ever happened in an ODI?
2 greats of the gameViv and Paul Collingwood have done it.
Maxwell to replace Zampa. That batting is too weak. Marsh/Stoinis/Paine at 5-7 looks fragile af. Zampa doesn't do much that you can't get out of Maxwell/Head/Smith anyway, definitely not enough to justify losing a batsman for him.Despite the win there was absolutely no questions answered for Australia.
Occasionally Hazlewood, Starc and Cummins are going to take a bag and win a game for you. But our batting failed yet again and the worst offender from the past few games was the guy who made the runs this time. We still are no closer to figuring out our full strength side.
Finch
Warner
Head
Smith
Marsh
Stoinis
Paine
Starc
Cummins
Hazlewood
Zampa
Appears to be what the selectors are thinking. Zampa and Paine I don't think should be there. Maxwell needs to slot in somewhere. But with Smith and Warner not in the runs our entire team looks out of sorts.