Migara
International Coach
I honestly don't have a opening to fill him in. May be if Dikwell is playing dropping Kusal Mendis and playing him at #3 may be a solution.You don't rate Bhanuka?
I honestly don't have a opening to fill him in. May be if Dikwell is playing dropping Kusal Mendis and playing him at #3 may be a solution.You don't rate Bhanuka?
Yes. That's my team.I honestly don't have a opening to fill him in. May be if Dikwell is playing dropping Kusal Mendis and playing him at #3 may be a solution.
96-15, our strength was bowling. Yes we did have some good batters, but nothing compared to ones on world stage. Only Sanga and Mathews average 40 with the bat, all others were mid to low 30s batsmen. Our modus operandi was put a moderate score and squeeze the opposition till they suffocate with impeccable middle overs bowling. Then came Malinga and hitting him for 7 - 8 over was not fun. All this changed when 2 balls were employed. Spinners became less potent, and reverse swing becae almost non existent. Sri Lankan batsmen are brough on humangous sized grounds, so we don't have many six hittersm unless it is some one like Jayasuriya or Mathews who are extremely strong guys.Enjoying the development of this new SL side some exciting prospects in this still far cry from the 96-15 era where they always had a very strong core but its shaping up in to something interesting.
96-15 the only atg is Murali and may be Malinga and Vaas are atvgs while there are quite a few atg and atvg batsmen there. How do you say that bowling was the strength?96-15, our strength was bowling. Yes we did have some good batters, but nothing compared to ones on world stage. Only Sanga and Mathews average 40 with the bat, all others were mid to low 30s batsmen. Our modus operandi was put a moderate score and squeeze the opposition till they suffocate with impeccable middle overs bowling. Then came Malinga and hitting him for 7 - 8 over was not fun. All this changed when 2 balls were employed. Spinners became less potent, and reverse swing becae almost non existent. Sri Lankan batsmen are brough on humangous sized grounds, so we don't have many six hittersm unless it is some one like Jayasuriya or Mathews who are extremely strong guys.
Then our bowling stocks came crashing down. Batsmen are probably as same level a decade ago, but once the unorthodox and relentless bowling attack was disbanded due to retirements, we had no answer.
Who are these guys?while there are quite a few atg and atvg batsmen there
Atg in SL context. Comparing SL batsmen to SL bowlers, who are your top 5 / top 10 players? Below is mine from top of my mind with my limited sl knowledge.Who are these guys?
I don't know if anyone is really an ATG. Sanath might just about make it into an ATG ODI team, but even that is debatable I think. No one else is even close.
Are we talking tests or limited over stuff. Assuming it's testsAtg in SL context. Comparing SL batsmen to SL bowlers, who are your top 5 / top 10 players? Below is mine from top of my mind with my limited sl knowledge.
1. Murali
2. Sanga
3. Aravinda
4. Jayasuriya
5. Jayawardene
6. Vaas
7. Malinga
8. Matthews
9. Ranatunga
10. Dharmasena
Batsmen just dominate that list.
You just forgot Ajantha Mendis who was unstoppable for few years, then Nuwan kulasekara and Jayasuriya as a bowler. Then here and there bowlers like Fernando comes in and bowls a dream spell. Important thing is SL's six best ODI bowlers (Murali, Vaas, Malinga, Mendis, Jayasuriya and Kulasekara) played together. That has not happened for any other country. Easily one of the best ODI attacks assembled if not the best.96-15 the only atg is Murali and may be Malinga and Vaas are atvgs while there are quite a few atg and atvg batsmen there. How do you say that bowling was the strength?
I assume you're talking ODIs. Among the batsmen, only Sanath gets close to the top and even he's not at all consistent. De Silva and Jayawardene are good batsmen but they also have been inconsistent. Sanga is rubbish and a prank batsman in this format. Dilshan, Matthews, and Ranatunga have been ok.Atg in SL context. Comparing SL batsmen to SL bowlers, who are your top 5 / top 10 players? Below is mine from top of my mind with my limited sl knowledge.
1. Murali
2. Sanga
3. Aravinda
4. Jayasuriya
5. Jayawardene
6. Vaas
7. Malinga
8. Matthews
9. Ranatunga
10. Dharmasena
Batsmen just dominate that list.
I think that caveat makes this the nicest thing I've ever seen you say about Sanga.Sanga is rubbish and a prank batsman in this format.
What's up with Kumar being rubbish and a prank batsman?I assume you're talking ODIs. Among the batsmen, only Sanath gets close to the top and even he's not at all consistent. De Silva and Jayawardene are good batsmen but they also have been inconsistent. Sanga is rubbish and a prank batsman in this format. Dilshan, Matthews, and Ranatunga have been ok.
The bowling is a bit better with one genuine ATG in Murali. Malinga is probably one of the best T20 bowlers of all time but I think both him and Vaas are both ATVGs. If you factor in Herath, Mendis, and maybe even Sanath, who all touch that list, it's a fair assumption to make. In fact, a lot of the batsmen are kind of rated higher as overall players because they also do other things and contribute in other ways, particularly with the ball.
Yeah, I'll grudgingly concede he's not completely useless in Tests. I still think he's massively overrated and a hack, but yeah, he's made the best of very limited ability.I think that caveat makes this the nicest thing I've ever seen you say about Sanga.
LOL obviously some of us are missing the joke.Yeah, I'll grudgingly concede he's not completely useless in Tests. I still think he's massively overrated and a hack, but yeah, he's made the best of very limited ability.
TalentI want to see Nathan Coulter nile back in the Australia asap. What stopping him guys.
Daily reminder that Head even if he's injured and can't bat > Wade.Talent
In other news, Travis in doubt for the first test. Big blow.
Who comes in guys?