• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

**Official** Australia in West Indies

Majin

International Debutant
Considering turning it back on tbf, Cricinfo commentary of his antics sounds pretty hilarious
 

Mr Mxyzptlk

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Safe to say, I think, that West Indies gained much more from this series than Australia. Some courage, passion and general desire by the home side. Australia certainly did not win as comfortably as a 2-0 margin suggests. And West Indies fought a lot harder than many armchair pundits gave them a chance to.
 

pasag

RTDAS
Well that's that.

I'll put my hand up and say that I thought this series would be a walk over for Australia and boy was I proven wrong. Every Test has been a fight and full credit must go to the WIndies for putting up an excellent fight.

Chanderpaul must be man of the series for me, I think sometime towards the middle of the series he developed this aura of "You're not getting me out so don't even try" to the Australian bowlers. You could tell their body language was different when he was at the crease.

Lot's of positive for the WI, Marshall for one and their bowling unit. Hopefully they'll only improve and the results over the past year have shown that. Still a lot of holes to plug though.

Australia, well well, the bowling has been shown up in this series as inadequate. Two world class bowlers and two substandard ones won't be enough to maintain dominance in world cricket, that's for sure but will it be enough to remain even number one? I don't think so. Still, the foundation for the best side in the world is there, the best batting side plus two of the best bowlers in the world, all we need to do is plug the remaining two bowling positions and we're set. Easier said then done. Anyways, better to find out these things before India and South Africa.

Anyways, off to bed, have an exam that starts at 9.30 ffs.
 

Mr Mxyzptlk

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Lot's of positive for the WI... their bowling unit.
Very much so. Especially on day three when they laboured throughout the day on the flattest of pitches, but they refused to die and kept charging in. Was the most refreshing thing I've seen since Marshall played that first cover drive in Antigua.
 

Laurrz

International Debutant
Safe to say, I think, that West Indies gained much more from this series than Australia. Some courage, passion and general desire by the home side. Australia certainly did not win as comfortably as a 2-0 margin suggests. And West Indies fought a lot harder than many armchair pundits gave them a chance to.
what australia gained - some MAJOR concerns for india

tbh i dont mind, get all the ****tyness away and WORK on our problems

dropped catches my god..

for windies im excited for them, who are they playing next in tests.. they're a good unit now
 

aussie tragic

International Captain
Haddin joins some great company by taking 16 catches for the series

Australia Record for most catches in a 3-test series:

Healy 17
Gilchrist 17
Marsh 16 (twice)
Haddin 16

...now if only he didn't drop that catch ;)
 

Mr Mxyzptlk

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Should be NZ. Definitely have a chance agains them.
At that time of year in New Zealand the batsmen will have to tighten up a fair bit. And considering that there's no Test cricket or first-class cricket until then, that might be a difficult thing. I'm gonna call a big series for Jerome Taylor and Fidel Edwards though, if they're fit. Edwards was superb the last time around. The question remains whether West Indies can find a third seamer of any quality though.
 

PhoenixFire

International Coach
Great effort from WI, never expected them to get as close as they did. I reckon if Chanderpaul had been able to survive that all from Clark, then WI would hav had a really good chance of actually winning the game.

Lol @ Powell batting.
 

Mister Wright

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Nice effort from the Windies, not just in the recent innings, but throughout the whole series. Hopefully Dyson sticks with them and the ex-players lay off them and they can develop their young talent.
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Really? I didn't see all of his bowling but I thought he was reasonably accurate at least. Certainly better than MacGill.

On the up side, his 1st up figures were better than Warne's.

Therefore, based upon this statistical sample, we can extrapolate that Casson will go on to take 1,421 test wickets at an average of 14.26 :)

TBH, I'm more concerned about Johnson and the third seamer, because we have other options there, but I suspect the loyalty factor may see him get a longer go than he's deserving ATM. I wonder if he's fallen into the trap a young McGrath did - everyone telling him he had to swing the ball to be effective. McGrath did that v England 94-95, bowled trash and got dropped.

He then worked out he was better off bowling his way, not the way others wanted to.

Johnnson strikes me as similar. If he can't swing it naturally, then concerntrate on getting good bounce and moving it off the deck. Anyway, that's my two cents.
 

Mr Mxyzptlk

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Really? I didn't see all of his bowling but I thought he was reasonably accurate at least. Certainly better than MacGill.
Oh he was miles better than MacGill, but MacGill was laughably short of Test standard in this series. Casson's accuracy improved, but he did not look threatening enough to take a 3-for on such a flat surface. He did a good job to get Bravo though, persisting well.
 

aussie

Hall of Fame Member
At that time of year in New Zealand the batsmen will have to tighten up a fair bit. And considering that there's no Test cricket or first-class cricket until then, that might be a difficult thing. I'm gonna call a big series for Jerome Taylor and Fidel Edwards though, if they're fit. Edwards was superb the last time around. The question remains whether West Indies can find a third seamer of any quality though.
Whats the 411 on Collymore & Collins status over here with that kolpak situation. Did they abandon the windies to play for the counties or are the county boards bullying the WICB?. Since having Collins back instead of bowling would be perfect for them.


He didn't bowl as well as that IMO
Word, that rough outside the left-handers off-stump helped him a bit, but he looks to have the raw stuff. But so did Hauritz in 04... the sooner AUS unleash a 4-prong seam attack the better.

Burgey said:
Johnnson strikes me as similar. If he can't swing it naturally, then concerntrate on getting good bounce and moving it off the deck. Anyway, that's my two cents.
Word, even when Johnson made his ODI debut he took a while to even develop ability to swing the white ball. I personally do expect Johnson to come good in the future, just a patience thing in how long he does take to figure out his strenghts in test cricket.
 

Top