"Poor" is an understatement.Used to be a batsman. Just has poor shot selection.
Your timing is as "poor" as Casson's bowling.Considering turning it back on tbf, Cricinfo commentary of his antics sounds pretty hilarious
Very much so. Especially on day three when they laboured throughout the day on the flattest of pitches, but they refused to die and kept charging in. Was the most refreshing thing I've seen since Marshall played that first cover drive in Antigua.Lot's of positive for the WI... their bowling unit.
what australia gained - some MAJOR concerns for indiaSafe to say, I think, that West Indies gained much more from this series than Australia. Some courage, passion and general desire by the home side. Australia certainly did not win as comfortably as a 2-0 margin suggests. And West Indies fought a lot harder than many armchair pundits gave them a chance to.
WI definitely have the superior batting lineup at the moment. Bowling is a different matter, but I'd certainly be backing the West Indies at home. It'd be close in NZ.Should be NZ. Definitely have a chance agains them.
At that time of year in New Zealand the batsmen will have to tighten up a fair bit. And considering that there's no Test cricket or first-class cricket until then, that might be a difficult thing. I'm gonna call a big series for Jerome Taylor and Fidel Edwards though, if they're fit. Edwards was superb the last time around. The question remains whether West Indies can find a third seamer of any quality though.Should be NZ. Definitely have a chance agains them.
He didn't bowl as well as that IMO.Casson's match figures 3/129, that's about what we should be expecting, decent effort IMO.
Oh he was miles better than MacGill, but MacGill was laughably short of Test standard in this series. Casson's accuracy improved, but he did not look threatening enough to take a 3-for on such a flat surface. He did a good job to get Bravo though, persisting well.Really? I didn't see all of his bowling but I thought he was reasonably accurate at least. Certainly better than MacGill.
Whats the 411 on Collymore & Collins status over here with that kolpak situation. Did they abandon the windies to play for the counties or are the county boards bullying the WICB?. Since having Collins back instead of bowling would be perfect for them.At that time of year in New Zealand the batsmen will have to tighten up a fair bit. And considering that there's no Test cricket or first-class cricket until then, that might be a difficult thing. I'm gonna call a big series for Jerome Taylor and Fidel Edwards though, if they're fit. Edwards was superb the last time around. The question remains whether West Indies can find a third seamer of any quality though.
Word, that rough outside the left-handers off-stump helped him a bit, but he looks to have the raw stuff. But so did Hauritz in 04... the sooner AUS unleash a 4-prong seam attack the better.He didn't bowl as well as that IMO
Word, even when Johnson made his ODI debut he took a while to even develop ability to swing the white ball. I personally do expect Johnson to come good in the future, just a patience thing in how long he does take to figure out his strenghts in test cricket.Burgey said:Johnnson strikes me as similar. If he can't swing it naturally, then concerntrate on getting good bounce and moving it off the deck. Anyway, that's my two cents.