SamSawnoff
U19 Vice-Captain
The Aussie tail from six down added twice as many runs as the Sri Lankans overall. In a low scoring match that's a big deal.Card is revealing. Mahela 105, Muss + Mathews 95, Clarke 60, Ponting 44, sweet little else.
The Aussie tail from six down added twice as many runs as the Sri Lankans overall. In a low scoring match that's a big deal.Card is revealing. Mahela 105, Muss + Mathews 95, Clarke 60, Ponting 44, sweet little else.
Hardly surprising, but that's exactly why a strong tail can be so important.The Aussie tail from six down added twice as many runs as the Sri Lankans overall. In a low scoring match that's a big deal.
I didn't have the sound up today. Didn't want to listen to shiny suited snake oil selling.h00ssey it is.
Next test being in Kandy should suit Tony Greig to the ground. Fat ****.
It's one game on possibly the worst pitch for his style of bowling. Give him time.
No doubt he should be presisted with but he certainly would have to improve in the upcoming games and learn to adapt his bowling in different conditions.It's his first match. And they've won it. I hope he gets some breathing space.
Of course winning matches didn't help McDonald who was a player who could do the same job.
It wasn't a great pitch for him and Clarke didn't give him the really long spells he thrives on. He'll take plenty of wickets I've no doubt. Of course if he doesn't he'll lose his spot just like anyone else, but use him right and I don't think that it will end up being a problem.Nobody is saying Copeland has been bad but its hard to see him holding his spot for a long time by just being a containing element of this bowling attack, of course nobody expects him to take a 5-fer every alternate innings in test cricket like he does in first-class cricket but still he needs to take some wickets to pull his weight in the side.
The pitch surely didn't suit likes of Watto and Harris either but they found a way around that, they attacked the stumps,bowled cutters and kept mixing things up.It wasn't a great pitch for him and Clarke didn't give him the really long spells he thrives on. He'll take plenty of wickets I've no doubt. Of course if he doesn't he'll lose his spot just like anyone else, but use him right and I don't think that it will end up being a problem.
They are more experienced though, be interesting to see if Copeland learns quickly about what needs to be done at this level like somebody like Bresnan has done for England. Bresnan looked an ordinary swing bowler in his debut series, far more than that now.The pitch surely didn't suit likes of Watto and Harris either but they found a way around that, they attacked the stumps,bowled cutters and kept mixing things up.
Copeland needs to learn a lot but still I would have expected to see him do a few basic things like run his fingers across the ball or bowl a bumper every now and then to push the batsman back, also I'm sure Clarke would have given him long spells had he looked threatening with the ball.
i thought spark was his usual dependable stuffWho gets MOTM?
I was consistent tbf.i thought spark was his usual dependable stuff
pup11 had a shocker though
consistently ****, ****I was consistent tbf.
Copeland's biggest problem is people don't take him for what he is - an extremely accurate, tall medium pacer who bowls one bad ball a week.No doubt he should be presisted with but he certainly would have to improve in the upcoming games and learn to adapt his bowling in different conditions.
Thisconsistently ****, ****