The major difference though has been Hilfenhaus has erred in length on the fuller side which is something one shouldn't, as him being a swing bowler he should try to bowl a fuller length, whereas on the other hand Bollinger has been bowling a shortish length so far, rather have him bowl half-volleys looking to swing the ball, rather than bowl half-trackers.I really don't think Hilfenhaus has bowled much better judging by the cricinfo commentary. They've both produced a few edges with good balls and bowled a heap of tripe in between.
Haha. If he's that bad of a person then he deserves not to play First Class Cricket.He must be very jealous of his younger brother getting the jump on him and playing test cricket. Imagine they wouldn't get on that well.
I reckon people are harsh about his batting in general TBH. We've only seen him play one Test innings and he's strung together consistent Shield seasons.McDonald once again showing his ability to bowl tightly and chip in with a wicket, he could prove to be a very handy bowler for Ponting in this attack, given his ability to bottle up one end, but unfortunately his batting capabilities at this level could eventually prove to be his undoing.
I reckon people are harsh about his batting in general TBH. We've only seen him play one Test innings and he's strung together consistent Shield seasons.
I definitely think he's good enough to be a Test #7. I have more pressing concerns over whether Haddin's good enough to be a Test #6 which casts a shaddow over whether we can actually carry McDonald, but that's not really his fault as such.
Haddin batting at #6 in test cricket seriously weakens the batting line-up imo, he has stepped-up brilliantly in the recent past, but to expect him to keep wickets and then bat in the top 6 with any sort of consistency is asking for way too much.I reckon people are harsh about his batting in general TBH. We've only seen him play one Test innings and he's strung together consistent Shield seasons.
I definitely think he's good enough to be a Test #7. I have more pressing concerns over whether Haddin's good enough to be a Test #6 which casts a shaddow over whether we can actually carry McDonald, but that's not really his fault as such.
You really do talk out of your ass.I'm still surprised they didn't pick Albertus Morkel. If he smashed the likes of McGain for sixes it would demoralise the Aussies to an extent. They obviously don't think he's up to anything beyond T20 and 50 over cricket. He must be very jealous of his younger brother getting the jump on him and playing test cricket. Imagine they wouldn't get on that well. If McDonald does all right here he might pip North for the test berth though there's been a lot of talk of Marcus getting the nod to shore up the batting; they don't seem to trust McDonald too much with the bat yet, which is understandable.
So what part of that don't you agree with? Aren't McDonald and North in a race for a spot? Aren't they wary of McDonald's batting at test level?You really do talk out of your ass.
The part where the Morkel brothers don't get on because Morne plays test cricket and Albie is very jealous of that. I stopped reading there.So what part of that don't you agree with? Aren't McDonald and North in a race for a spot? Aren't they wary of McDonald's batting at test level?
Let's get something straight here bru, it's fokken Albie, OK?And wouldn't Albertus smashing sixes demoralise the Aussies?
The part where the Morkel brothers don't get on because Morne plays test cricket and Albie is very jealous of that. I stopped reading there.
McGain doing a bit of a Krejza in the tour match... quick, send for Cameron White!Looks like McGain will not be playing in the first Test if he continues at this rate. 1/68 off 9 really is not a great effort.