That's got to be the strongest pace attack rolled out in cricket for a while, unless they've all played together before as welltbqh those 4 pacers (Steyn, Morkel, Philander, Rabada) all deserve a place in this XI so I don't mind this. It's not like SA have needed quality spinners to win matches in the past
First time the`ve all been fit since Rabada came into the side.....That's got to be the strongest pace attack rolled out in cricket for a while, unless they've all played together before as well
Shamsi has the potential of being a world class spinner.... would probably have to drop Morkel at this stage for him.i reckon just play your best 4 bowlers unless there is a pitch super suited to spin which you probs won't get this summer - maybe the SCG but everyone says it doesn't even turn as much as its used to
Still young, but pretty good... excellent variation as well.How good is Shamsi control wise?
Between injuries and spending all his time on the bench (Kallis was still around)... when he eventually got a shot ,he was terrible.I remember Parnells LO debut out here back in '09, surprised to find he's played **** all cricket since then
I think Dereck Parry was regarded as a pretty good offie, but I don't know that he played much at all for the reason you stated. There was also Harper but tbh I don't think he was much chop.i reckon just play your best 4 bowlers unless there is a pitch super suited to spin which you probs won't get this summer - maybe the SCG but everyone says it doesn't even turn as much as its used to
I wonder if there was a decent Windies spinner in the 80s kept in FC despite being the best in his country, simply because he wasn't good enough to justify selection ahead of Roberts/Garner/Holding/Marshall/Croft
If there is some juice in the track ill be happy for Burns if he lasts a session without getting caught behind the wicket or bowled/lbw.You just know this whole Marsh injury is perfectly set up for Burns to score a ton and retain his place.
Technically misses by 1... 6 players of colour, 2 of which should be 'black' which your team meets... hence the issue of Duminy. But the real target is based on an overall avg across all formats, so if we play more players of colour in LO it can account for the test team having 5 players.1. Cook
2. Elgar
3. du Plessis
4. Amla
5. de Villiers
6. Bavuma
7. de Kock
8. Philander
9. Rabada
10. Steyn
11. Shamsi
12. Rossouw
13. Duminy
14. Morkel
15. Abbott
Seems like the logical progression to me. Does that hit quota targets?
lol as if du Plessis has the balls to go anywhere near number 3.1. Cook
2. Elgar
3. du Plessis
4. Amla
5. de Villiers
6. Bavuma
7. de Kock
8. Philander
9. Rabada
10. Steyn
11. Shamsi
12. Rossouw
13. Duminy
14. Morkel
15. Abbott
Seems like the logical progression to me. Does that hit quota targets?
corrected....
Shamsi before Maharaj (assuming we play a spinner), as nice as the batting for Maharaj may be.. And obviously Amla must bat 3.IMO Philander, Morris and Parnell are good enough to bat at 7 in tests. If South Africa wants to play their best team then Vern must bat at 7. But then again we are a conservative nation so we'll probably see this team.
Elgar
Cook
Du plessis
Amla
Bavuma
Duminy
DeKock
Philander
Maharaj
Rabada
Steyn.
Based on form that looks about right.
The last time a we played a wrist spinner down under, he got murdered. Do you really want to take that chance?Shamsi before Maharaj (assuming we play a spinner), as nice as the batting for Maharaj may be.. And obviously Amla must bat 3.
Yeah hiding at 5 is more his speed isn't it.lol as if du Plessis has the balls to go anywhere near number 3.