• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Australia in Pakistan 2022

Spikey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
if Pakistan continue to go at 10 an over, they will get this target in *checks notes* 17.4 overs.
 

cnerd123

likes this
If these two are in with 120 needed in the final 15 then I reckon they'll go for it. Can trust the tail to block it out if it comes to it.

Lyon needs to mix things up a bit more.
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
I think both teams are trying to scare the other off a bit here. They may have a go for a certain period sometime in this session but if they lose even one wicket, they are gonna shut shop. A lot of this feels like very artificial day 5 interest.

The pitch is really not a result pitch. That has been the issue both tests.
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
have you seen this tail? they are the stupidest in the world. dumber than gabriel. dumber than nz.

hasan ali trying to launch ajaz patel over long on's head with a set batsman at the other end and the game on the slide is embedded in my memory.
People learn, even cricketers.
 

trundler

Request Your Custom Title Now!
have you seen this tail? they are the stupidest in the world. dumber than gabriel. dumber than nz.

hasan ali trying to launch ajaz patel over long on's head with a set batsman at the other end and the game on the slide is embedded in my memory.
They'll be better off slogging if anything. Shaheen has even developed some hitting pedigree these days. Have the men out there whom we'd ideally want though. Loads riding on them to not lose.
 

Top