Bahnz
Hall of Fame Member
McCullum admittedly a less imaginative captain than the great oneyes, farewell to Afridi without the bowling
McCullum admittedly a less imaginative captain than the great oneyes, farewell to Afridi without the bowling
I feel like if anyone did this with England or Australia players they would have been infracted by now.It's a poor Australian bowling attack. Seriously! losing wickets to Boland, Hastings and Marsh? try reading Mustafizur Rahman.
You misspelled there guy. I'm not god I'm Gobplease god no
That post actually was infracted ftr.I feel like if anyone did this with England or Australia players they would have been infracted by now.
Instead it's Bangladesh, so we take more of a 'oh you' kind of approach, like when an excitable puppy pisses on the floor
Probably putting too much on his plate tbh, although I do know they experimented with him at #3 in that stupid tri-series 18 months back. The role he plays right now is just fine for him.Mitch Marsh to open? Just flog through the line like Arun does now. Usman at three, TPC four and Jimmy Stewart five (for now. Agree he won't likely be there at the next WC). Then The Big No at six, Inbred at seven, Nev eight and the bowlers. The attack would likely be Starc, Haze, MMarsh, Inbred and Zampa with some overs by Big No.
I actually didn't understand the post.I feel like if anyone did this with England or Australia players they would have been infracted by now.
Instead it's Bangladesh, so we take more of a 'oh you' kind of approach, like when an excitable puppy pisses on the floor
Funnily enough I'd actually given him an infraction for that post already.I feel like if anyone did this with England or Australia players they would have been infracted by now.
And tbf Fizzy is way better than Boland, so he's not completely wrong eitherFunnily enough I'd actually given him an infraction for that post already.
There's some truth in what you say though; he probably would have got a stack more already if it wasn't Bangladesh.
I think Faulkner makes the side at full strength on bowling alone unless they decide to play a spinner, and then he still makes it until Starc is back.To be honest if the alternative is Boland then I don't see much reason why you can't play both MMarsh and Faulkner as fully fledged all-rounders, expected to contribute fully with both bat and ball.
at home may I add?so mediocre he scored three fifties in three wc knockouts
Yeah it's genuinely hard to pick an order for all of 5-8. I'd just use them in a floating basis tbh, and just send out whoever is most suited to whatever situation.I think Faulkner makes the side at full strength on bowling alone unless they decide to play a spinner, and then he still makes it until Starc is back.
Faulkner v Hastings becomes a tough call if Starc is fit and Wade is playing, but I'd rather ditch Wade, play a specialist keeper and have Faulkner at seven; a role which he definitely beats out Hastings for.
1 Finch
2 Warner
3 Khawaja
4 Smith
5 Maxwell
6 Marsh
7 Faulkner
8 Nevill
9 Hastings/Zampa
10 Starc
11 Haze
That's what I'd be looking at, moving forward. I'd be tempted to stick Nevill up the order at 5 if three early wickets fell too, as cake.
He looks it. He's still basically a kid, but he's accurate enough, has good variations and definitely seems to have the stomach for the fight. Two matches, but nonetheless a lot to like already.Is Zampa good?
I'm not convinced he's the best spinner available tbh. I was just using him as code for 'whichever random spinner they've chucked in the squad on the day'. He deserves a run for now though.Is Zampa good?
I feel like if anyone did this with England or Australia players they would have been infracted by now.
Instead it's Bangladesh, so we take more of a 'oh you' kind of approach, like when an excitable puppy pisses on the floor
That's pretty condescending.Funnily enough I'd actually given him an infraction for that post already.
There's some truth in what you say though; he probably would have got a stack more already if it wasn't Bangladesh.