• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** Australia in New Zealand 2016

Howe_zat

Audio File
It's a poor Australian bowling attack. Seriously! losing wickets to Boland, Hastings and Marsh? try reading Mustafizur Rahman.
I feel like if anyone did this with England or Australia players they would have been infracted by now.

Instead it's Bangladesh, so we take more of a 'oh you' kind of approach, like when an excitable puppy pisses on the floor
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Mitch Marsh to open? Just flog through the line like Arun does now. Usman at three, TPC four and Jimmy Stewart five (for now. Agree he won't likely be there at the next WC). Then The Big No at six, Inbred at seven, Nev eight and the bowlers. The attack would likely be Starc, Haze, MMarsh, Inbred and Zampa with some overs by Big No.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
I feel like if anyone did this with England or Australia players they would have been infracted by now.

Instead it's Bangladesh, so we take more of a 'oh you' kind of approach, like when an excitable puppy pisses on the floor
That post actually was infracted ftr.

Mitch Marsh to open? Just flog through the line like Arun does now. Usman at three, TPC four and Jimmy Stewart five (for now. Agree he won't likely be there at the next WC). Then The Big No at six, Inbred at seven, Nev eight and the bowlers. The attack would likely be Starc, Haze, MMarsh, Inbred and Zampa with some overs by Big No.
Probably putting too much on his plate tbh, although I do know they experimented with him at #3 in that stupid tri-series 18 months back. The role he plays right now is just fine for him.
 
Last edited:

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I feel like if anyone did this with England or Australia players they would have been infracted by now.

Instead it's Bangladesh, so we take more of a 'oh you' kind of approach, like when an excitable puppy pisses on the floor
I actually didn't understand the post.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
I feel like if anyone did this with England or Australia players they would have been infracted by now.
Funnily enough I'd actually given him an infraction for that post already.

There's some truth in what you say though; he probably would have got a stack more already if it wasn't Bangladesh.
 

Spikey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
i guess you could keep bailey in there for stability and float lynn in whenever people get rested
 

Spark

Global Moderator
To be honest if the alternative is Boland then I don't see much reason why you can't play both MMarsh and Faulkner as fully fledged all-rounders, expected to contribute fully with both bat and ball. Which I guess means you play Zampa as your spinner and the extra proper batsman rather than the all-rounder.
 
Last edited:

cnerd123

likes this
Funnily enough I'd actually given him an infraction for that post already.

There's some truth in what you say though; he probably would have got a stack more already if it wasn't Bangladesh.
And tbf Fizzy is way better than Boland, so he's not completely wrong either :ph34r:
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
To be honest if the alternative is Boland then I don't see much reason why you can't play both MMarsh and Faulkner as fully fledged all-rounders, expected to contribute fully with both bat and ball.
I think Faulkner makes the side at full strength on bowling alone unless they decide to play a spinner, and then he still makes it until Starc is back.

Faulkner v Hastings becomes a tough call if Starc is fit and Wade is playing, but I'd rather ditch Wade, play a specialist keeper and have Faulkner at seven; a role which he definitely beats out Hastings for.

1 Finch
2 Warner
3 Khawaja
4 Smith
5 Maxwell
6 Marsh
7 Faulkner
8 Nevill
9 Hastings/Zampa
10 Starc
11 Haze

That's what I'd be looking at, moving forward. I'd be tempted to stick Nevill up the order at 5 if three early wickets fell too, as cake.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
I think Faulkner makes the side at full strength on bowling alone unless they decide to play a spinner, and then he still makes it until Starc is back.

Faulkner v Hastings becomes a tough call if Starc is fit and Wade is playing, but I'd rather ditch Wade, play a specialist keeper and have Faulkner at seven; a role which he definitely beats out Hastings for.

1 Finch
2 Warner
3 Khawaja
4 Smith
5 Maxwell
6 Marsh
7 Faulkner
8 Nevill
9 Hastings/Zampa
10 Starc
11 Haze

That's what I'd be looking at, moving forward. I'd be tempted to stick Nevill up the order at 5 if three early wickets fell too, as cake.
Yeah it's genuinely hard to pick an order for all of 5-8. I'd just use them in a floating basis tbh, and just send out whoever is most suited to whatever situation.
 

Senile Sentry

International Debutant
Well done NZ. I thought 240 was indefensible but they managed it. Questions galore for Australia. Especially the continued viability of Bailey who's clearly on the decline now. Maxwell has suddenly gone into a shell with just 16 runs in his last 5 international innings.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Is Zampa good?
He looks it. He's still basically a kid, but he's accurate enough, has good variations and definitely seems to have the stomach for the fight. Two matches, but nonetheless a lot to like already.

Any time a leggie is getting top order bats caught at cover/short cover, that's a sign that they have some talent.
 

hendrix

Hall of Fame Member
I feel like if anyone did this with England or Australia players they would have been infracted by now.

Instead it's Bangladesh, so we take more of a 'oh you' kind of approach, like when an excitable puppy pisses on the floor
Funnily enough I'd actually given him an infraction for that post already.

There's some truth in what you say though; he probably would have got a stack more already if it wasn't Bangladesh.
That's pretty condescending.

There's at least one other Bangladeshi user on here who's a pretty good poster.

And (myself being from the Land of The Great Inferiority Complex), there's no need to talk out your arse when your team is actually doing pretty well.
 

Top