TheJediBrah
Request Your Custom Title Now!
I need kiwiviktor to come in tell me again about how Smith will be destroyed in NZ and won't make 50 runs for the series
Bracewell was the best Kiwi seamer in the series in Australia, so I don't think it's just incumbency. I guess his figures aren't too great, but he was the best bowler in the first two tests when everyone was struggling and did well in Adelaide when it was a bit more bowler friendly as well.
Doug took 0/170 in Brisbane so if he was our best it's only because Southee injured himself and Boult bowled terribly.dougeh is a semi-short wide shouldered 135kph bowler who quietly does his job. half our membership lives in auckland or wellington. of course they want the next flashy shiny thing.
Most likely he would've because he's just a much better bowler than Doug.Don't think Henry would've necessarily been much better.
Wagner would've offered something different, maybe.
Only very technically. Would've been an ATG stumping if he'd managed it.Watling miss a stumping did he?
Barely a half chance. Big inside edge.Watling miss a stumping did he?
It would've been a catch tbfOnly very technically. Would've been an ATG stumping if he'd managed it.
Even Wade would have taken that oneBarely a half chance. Big inside edge.
Nah, because it isn't part of the actual shot itself. Would be an appeal, though.Most likely he would've because he's just a much better bowler than Doug.
Anway, rule question here: if a batsman comes down the wicket to a spinner, misses it and then in the course of scrambling back into his crease knocks the bails off, would he be out hit wicket? I'm guessing no, but I'm wondering if anyone can say for sure.
Nope. Not hit wicket when he's attempting to avoid a runout or stumpingMost likely he would've because he's just a much better bowler than Doug.
Anway, rule question here: if a batsman comes down the wicket to a spinner, misses it and then in the course of scrambling back into his crease knocks the bails off, would he be out hit wicket? I'm guessing no, but I'm wondering if anyone can say for sure.
haha, I'd planned to but I'd just gotten home and was literally so exhausted that I just fell onto my bed and passed out basically immediately. Can do tomorrow, though (or tonight, as case may be)trying to get spark to come on comms but no answer
The destroyers in that test were Danny Morrison & Dipak Patel The 92/93 NZ team was still riding high with World Cup momentum under Warren Lees and Crowe. The current team has the superior attack on paper, but I don't think there's that much difference in the batting.ta
gotta say that as much as grandpa simpson and the generic benchmark wannabes try to wind us up, nothing trolls me more than watching even mediocre australian sides grow an arm and a leg against nz teams that wilt at the sight of a kangaroo.
i mean an early to mid 90s nz team drew with borders australians and almost took a test off the west indies in the carribbean and that team was universally ****. im pretty sure this lot should be doing a little bit better than they have this summer. we don't have to win, i just want to see a contest.