pup11
International Coach
Obviously all that batting and fielding in that heat has got to Watto....
Obviously all that batting and fielding in that heat has got to Watto....
Enjoyed watching his innings todayObviously all that batting and fielding in that heat has got to Watto....
I think four sessions is too conservative. I reckon if they get a move on tomorrow they can have nearer five to play with, and somehow that sounds a lot more daunting.There are several things to take note out of a pretty good day from India:
- Pitch is flat as hell. Australia had absolutely no business getting shuttled for 268
- India should look to score 200 runs in the morning, and set Australia a target of 500, and then set very attacking fields.
- India should look to declare a couple of overs before tea tomorrow
- India cannot get bogged down as has happened before. This will allow Ponting to just play for time. No matter what, on this flat pitch, we need four full sessions.
- If India can get shuttled out tomorrow, the Aussie lineup will make things scary for India, so India need to walk a fine line.
- Dhoni needs to throw the ball to Sehwag, Sachin and Ganguly once in a white. You can't overbowl people, plus they can be good partnership breakers, especially Sehwag and Sachin.
I think this'll be a draw - unless they have no clue to Mishra, I don't see how we're going to take ten wickets. Ishant and Zaheer today were wayward a lot. Aussie lineup is too good to be taken cheaply twice in one match. Someone is going to come through with a big second innings century. If Ponting can do that in the next two days, he has answered pretty much all the questions in my mind, regarding India.
wonder how much Greg Chappell is helping, it boggles the mind that our brains trust is low on ideas with an ex-Indian coach in the ranks.
Yeah bat for 40 overs and score another 150-175 runs and leave Australia to score 475 in 140 overs. What does the forecast look like in Mohali ?I think they must bat for 40-50 overs tomorrow.That will give them about 130-140 overs at the Aussie batsmen.
Of course everyone wants to win the toss because it DOES give you some advantage. I NEVER said that it doesn't BUT that advantage is NEVER enough in itself to win games for you. That is the difference. Its like saying every captain wants his openers to give a good start, lets say, at least 75 runs for the first wicket. Of course every captain will want that, but 75 runs for the first wicket does not win the Test for you.the importance of winning a toss is best shown by the fact that very few captains [if any] would like to lose a toss [no matter what stats you give them]
Perfect...I think they must bat for 40-50 overs tomorrow.That will give them about 130-140 overs at the Aussie batsmen.
268 was a poor total but India deserve all the praise because they bowled Australia out rather than being gifted the wicketsA lot has been said about the Aussie bowling not being good enough, but I think the batsmen need to take a good look at themselves. India bowled very well, but 260 was still way below par.
For this side to compete well, the batsmen need to be very consistent so that when the bowlers have a good day they can capitalise, and when they don't they can draw. It's interesting times for Australia... and I can't see them changing any time soon. This team is as good as it gets really... Symonds may come back, but Watson is near the bottom of Australia's problems at the moment, and McGain is injured and untried too.
They'll just bat normally and hope to be in a position to assess the situation at tea on the last dayYep, a total of around 450 with 140 overs to get will be fantastic. That will invoke both questions in the mind of Australian batsmen, whether to go for win or draw. Though I guess they'll go for the former.
If they bat normally, like they did in the first innings, chances are that they will be eveluating their chances for the third test at tea on Day 5.They'll just bat normally and hope to be in a position to assess the situation at tea on the last day
As I said earlier, they need to be more positive in their footwork (and being agressive against at least one of the spinners should be on the agenda as well) but a "normal" batting display shouls see the team score at 3 runs per overIf they bat normally, like they did in the first innings, chances are that they will be eveluating their chances for the third test at tea on Day 5.
There are several things to take note out of a pretty good day from India:
- Pitch is flat as hell. Australia had absolutely no business getting shuttled for 268
- India should look to score 200 runs in the morning, and set Australia a target of 500, and then set very attacking fields.
- India should look to declare a couple of overs before tea tomorrow
- India cannot get bogged down as has happened before. This will allow Ponting to just play for time. No matter what, on this flat pitch, we need four full sessions.
- If India can get shuttled out tomorrow, the Aussie lineup will make things scary for India, so India need to walk a fine line.
- Dhoni needs to throw the ball to Sehwag, Sachin and Ganguly once in a white. You can't overbowl people, plus they can be good partnership breakers, especially Sehwag and Sachin.
I think this'll be a draw - unless they have no clue to Mishra, I don't see how we're going to take ten wickets. Ishant and Zaheer today were wayward a lot. Aussie lineup is too good to be taken cheaply twice in one match. Someone is going to come through with a big second innings century. If Ponting can do that in the next two days, he has answered pretty much all the questions in my mind, regarding India.
I think five sessions is too much -- but then again, I do tend to be very conservative about these things. That's up to 150 overs. Aussies can chase down 500 in that time.I think four sessions is too conservative. I reckon if they get a move on tomorrow they can have nearer five to play with, and somehow that sounds a lot more daunting.
This is really interesting. Do you mind if I steal your general idea to do an article for the website?I have just decided to look at Michael Clarke's stats a bit closer.
I wanted to see how he performed in situations where he went out to bat with Australia on a bad score.
He's batted at 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 so it was hard to say exactly what a bad score is, however I decided on 2/50 3/75, 4/120, 5/160 and 6/190.
There has been 12 instances in his career where he's come into bat in a bad situation and in that time he has made 203 runs at an average of 16.92 with a highest score of 37.
Do you think 12 innings is too small or a slight problem for Clarke? I have to say there was an instance when the score was 4/121 [just off the criteria] and he made a score which would have helped the average a bit.
[B][U]Bowler Overs Runs Wickets Average Econ[/U][/B]
B Lee 49.4 132 3 44.00 2.66
S Clarke 25 55 1 55.00 2.20
M Johnson 48.2 150 8 18.75 3.10
S Watson 40.1 103 1 103.00 2.56
C White 42.5 144 2 72.00 3.36
M Clarke 34.4 88 1 88.00 2.54
P Siddle 24.1 106 2 53.00 4.39
[B][U]Bowler Overs Runs Wickets Average Econ[/U][/B]
Z Khan 66.4 163 5 32.60 2.45
I Sharma 58.5 157 8 19.63 2.67
H Singh 86.2 226 4 56.50 2.62
A Kumble 45.1 147 0 NA 3.25
V Sehwag 12.3 21 0 NA 1.68
A Mishra 14.5 46 3 15.33 3.10
[B][U]Bowler Runs Balls Dismissal Avg SR[/U][/B]
Z Khan 56 114 1 56.00 49.12%
I Sharma 48 94 1 48.00 51.06%
H Singh 60 136 1 60.00 44.12%
A Kumble 43 72 0 NA 59.72%
V Sehwag 10 33 0 NA 30.30%
A Mishra 14 18 0 NA 77.78%
[B]TOTAL 231 467 3 77.00 49.46%[/B]