it makes perfect sense IMO to groom a young keeper in inconsequential ODI series. i would restrict the use of dravid as keeper to the big tournaments to keep him from getting injured.Richard said:Karthik's inclusion for ODIs baffles logic like many things about Indian selection, so I wouldn't be surprised if something else silly happens here.
Is that a judgement based upon an over where he was taken apart for 4 boundaries?Jnr. said:After his 'display' vs England in that semi-final match, Brett Lee should not even be going to India.
And I know that ODIs are way different to Tests, but if Lee can't even get the ODI's right, he will be slaughtered in the Tests in India.
Not really, but I don't think he has anything when the conditions don't suit him, he'll be easily taken to pieces.Is that a judgement based upon an over where he was taken apart for 4 boundaries?
No, I shouldn't think so, nor on a spell where he was taken apart for 65 off 9 overs.luckyeddie said:Is that a judgement based upon an over where he was taken apart for 4 boundaries?
And averages mean diddly-squat, don't they? Or is that only when you WANT them to mean nothing?Richard said:No, I shouldn't think so, nor on a spell where he was taken apart for 65 off 9 overs.
Just on the fact that, since 2001, he's averaged all but 40.
I've got a digital camera with sound and zoom - for a small fee, airfares and accomodation I'll give this whole third umpire gig a go!luckyeddie said:Telsor...
It's all down to this:
No tv coverage, no cameras for third umpire.
No third umpire, no test match.
nope because that wouldnt prove anything at all...seriously if karthik succeeded against bangladesh and zimbabwe would you really be convinced that he was a good enough batsman to play for india?Craig said:Or rather say against 'weaker' sides in a tournament (ie Zimbabwe, Bangladesh etc) if they play against them, but give him the gloves for the big games?