• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Australia in India 2023

Spark

Global Moderator
Just plug Boland in at one end as if we're playing at an old school MCG road. We at least need to establish control over the tempo of the game before anything else.
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
Boland looking quite a bit more dangerous than Cummins/Lyon.
Its interesting though. I have long felt there are bowlers whose bowling average flatters them coz they are usually used in a run saving role with a ring field with fewer catchers etc I know Cummins has not bowled at his best so far but it is the difference sometimes. Say a Starc bowls with 5 catchers and a 7-2 field but he will still bowl aggressive lines on the stumps and batsmen can flick away easy boundaries 3 or 4 times but then they get out. You will take that.

Its such a team game and it is why it is silly when we make these all time line-ups to not even consider the fact that similar role players playing together may not lead to the same results that their averages, especially, suggest.

Boland has bowled at least 4 to 5 balls that would have been 4s with a more aggressive bowler's field setting. But he is considered as a defensive bowling option and has that field to back it up. The moment you put him with two other Bolands and set an attacking field, bingo he goes for 20 in 4 overs. And that bowling average he has built up so far means nothing in the context of that hypothetical game.
 

Top