honestbharani
Whatever it takes!!!
I think he could have or would have skipped BBL but the board wanted the major players to play, I guess. Which is also understandable but I guess it results in a rather packed schedule for these guys.
Consistent good enough amymore*. Warners had moments where he's looked like his best self (double vs SA, odi's vs eng, UAE T20 WC, t20's leading up to the last WC). Just hasn't been able to be at his best consistently.He frankly is making all the usual "I want to retire" noises in terms of no longer being able to keep up with the intensity of international cricket except he and his family really have an axe to grind with his many critics in the cricketing media and want to prove them wrong. Fair enough, most of them deserve it, but you have to be actually good enough to follow through and he almost certainly isn't any more.
It took one of the strongest teams ever fielded at their zenith, minus one or two players who were easily replaced anyway, to take one series off India in India in the last 40 years. It took the second greatest batsman ever produced in this country batting out of his mind to get even vaguely close since then.I was looking forward to this series until I read this thread - blimey neither camp seems very confident ?
India is such a tough place to tour for non SC sides. 4 tests will stretch the Aussies resilience to the limit, it's so mentally demanding and the play will be pretty attritional.
Having said that I think it'll be a close series - but at home, I think India will just nick it unless the back up Aussie spinners can give Lyon some proper support.
Yeah it took one of the best knocks of smudge's career and O'keefe taking 12fer to even take a test off India last time. Beating a side that can field a side that has a guy who could bat #6 in SC conditions at 8, a guy averaging 50+ in tests with the bat over the past few years at 7 and a guy with a FC batting average of mid 30's at 9 while also picking their best bowling lineup is hard work, especially given that they have a 5 man attack with no obvious weak links on top of that. Their engine room even without pant completely mitigates the lack of a consistent second opener or #3/#4 who have consistently scored runs.It took one of the strongest teams ever fielded at their zenith, minus one or two players who were easily replaced anyway, to take one series off India in India in the last 40 years. It took the second greatest batsman ever produced in this country batting out of his mind to get even vaguely close since then.
The bar for Australia to clear is astronomically high. Anything above "mildly competitive" is already a very strong start, even notwithstanding that on paper this is as weak an Indian team as there's been in quite some time.
Needed root to make a double and stokes to have a great all-round game, plus India didn't have Jadeja and Axar tbf. Kinda like aus's Pune win. Takes ALOT to beat India at home. There's a reason they've been so dominant there recently.We dropped a test to England recently (needed a Root special but still, it’s England ffs).. it’ll be tough sure but all those past series from >10 years ago are a fair bit less relevant now.
Limit the number of lefties I assume. MaybeLot of talk about handscomb coming back if green is only fit to play as a specialist bat in India 1st test. Anyone else feel like Renshaw would be a better pick than handscomb? Averaged more than handscomb last time we toured India vs Ashwin + Jadeja than handscomb despite opening and seems far more solid vs pace.
Iyer wasn't a concern before the series as he has looked really good in Asian conditions.Yes, Jadeja-Axar-Ash at 7-9 will provide a lot of comfort for India. Siraj-Shami are in decent form too.
But the top order batting is the main worry, especially without Pant and Iyer in the middle.
Kohli-Iyer-Bharat at 4-6 looks quite tentative. Really need Kohli to do well this series while Pujara will be as usual the support guy to others. Rohit-Rahul at the top both will be playing tests after a long time too due to the injuries.