*Official* Australia in India 2023

[Daemon]

Ash isn't going to last very long playing like that lol. Hope he hits a few boundaries before he goes at least.

 

[Godard]

Nope, the partial front on clearly showed pad first.

No dude, at best it looked like it pad and bat together. Regardless, too doubtful to be given out. Kohli looked good tho, so that’s a good sign.

 

[honestbharani]

I will say it again. I have not seen any batsman more unlucky than Virat in the last 3 years.


Game is gone now thanks to that stupid decision and yesterday's dropped catch and silly captaincy by Rohit. ?

 

[OverratedSanity]

Kohli was very unlucky and played a good knock but he also didnt play that ball well. Not a coincidence he's had multiple of these "was it bat or pad first" decisions. It's a risky way to defend spin.

Both him and Iyer pretty unfortunate dismissals.

 

[artvandalay]

Kohli was very unlucky and played a good knock but he also didnt play that ball well. Not a coincidence he's had multiple of these "was it bat or pad first" decisions. It's a risky way to defend spin.

Both him and Iyer pretty unfortunate dismissals.

He looked an lbw candidate multiple times today itself playing back to many deliveries.

 

[subshakerz]

No dude, at best it looked like it pad and bat together. Regardless, too doubtful to be given out. Kohli looked good tho, so that’s a good sign.

Doubt goes in favor of the prosecution, not the defendant.

 

[Shady Slim]

Doubt goes in favor of the prosecution, not the defendant.

uh no it, uh, no it doesn't

 

[Daemon]

Doubt goes in favor of the prosecution, not the defendant.

er wtf it's literally the opposite

 

[artvandalay]

Doubt goes in favor of the prosecution, not the defendant.

Benefit of doubt goes to the batsman in cricket, this is not a courtroom.

 

[subshakerz]

Benefit of doubt goes to the batsman in cricket, this is not a courtroom.

Meaning the umpire on field already made his out call, and there wasn't sufficient evidence to overturn his decision.

 

[Godard]

Meaning the umpire on field already made his out call, and there wasn't sufficient evidence to overturn his decision.

There wasn’t sufficient evidence to make the call that he did. It was a bad call.

 

[subshakerz]

This would be the time a Wasim or Waqar would come on and try to york out the tail.

 

[Godard]

And in cricket, if you see on review, there should be sufficient evidence to uphold that decision

 

[OverratedSanity]

Credit to Australia. They've found what could be a repeatable tactic with the round the wicket line to the right handers. India need some counter to that. Our complete lack of left handers has always been a bit of a weakness.

 

[Gob]

Won't be the worst idea to Cummins to come in and target the stumps

 

[subshakerz]

There wasn’t sufficient evidence to make the call that he did. It was a bad call.

Except he made the right call.

The partial front on view which they showed for like 5 second only clearly showed pad first.

 

[slippy888]

india media are hyping up the catch taken by KL Rahul yesterday, that means he will definitely play in next test match.

 

[Starfighter]

Most umpires dont give those when the batsman is two strides down the wicket.

I do

 

[subshakerz]

Credit to Australia. They've found what could be a repeatable tactic with the round the wicket line to the right handers. India need some counter to that. Our complete lack of left handers has always been a bit of a weakness.

India are being undone by two debutant spinners this series and a veteran whom they have played and seen for a decade.

India are scared to play on batting wickets and let Australia's lineup build a large score.

But in spicing the wickets, they are leveling the bowling game because their own batting, Rohit aside, isn't in the best form.

 

[Godard]

Except he made the right call.

The partial front on view which they showed for like 5 second only clearly showed pad first.

Looked doubtful at best to me.