If they didn't host it, they'd never get to see it.And why do the Poms always get to host it?
Credit to them, in this case, for being bold and picking Kuhnemann. They could've sticked to the Agar first policy and made a mistake.tbh they probably had a fair idea which way they were going pending fitness assessments ont he morning of the game, but I agree flying in someone as replacement for the leggie then selecting him over the first picked SLA is ****ed up in the extreme.
In who's place though? Are they dropping Lyon ?Credit to them, in this case, for being bold and picking Kuhnemann. They could've sticked to the Agar first policy and made a mistake.
Presuming it's Boland but let's see.In who's place though? Are they dropping Lyon ?
India going in with no batsmen hasn't hurt them that much over the past couple of years tbfWould be interesting to see how light/weak they can afford to keep their batting.
Be funny when he bounces three blokes out.I assume Lyon will be taking the new rock?
Didn't Warne have a surprisingly vicious bouncer? Apart from one famous occasion I never saw him use it in a game, even as a surprise delivery.Be funny when he bounces three blokes out.
What, smog? They'll need a lung transplant after three over.Should help the fast bowlers these conditions you would think