• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Australia in India 2023

ataraxia

International Coach
Q: why don't they roll through all three upon seeing an umpires' call? Is this in the 3rd umpire's control, to notice the ball will obviously hit the stumps and thus the review is retained?
 

Son Of Coco

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Australia needs to get themselves into the fight here.

I reckon a beamer followed up by some strongly-worded questioning of the batsman's parentage would do the trick.
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I still don't understand wtf is umpire's call on impact.
No idea why it still exists. The umpires call for ball tracking makes sense because the predictive element of hawkeye is dodgy.

Impact is just literally objective for the most part. The only minor issue is that the frame for picking the exact point of impact can leave room for interpretation. But it's so minor.
 

Kenneth Viljoen

International Regular
Umpires call has a Grey area , what if the umpires gave it not out cause he thought it was bat first ? Then his not out call is upheld for the wrong reason. I think umpires call should be scrapped , either it's pitching outside leg or it isn't.
 

halba

State Captain
ridiculous.
this tail doesnt end though. bharat and axar are good batters
bharat ave 38 in FC for a wicketkeeper- thats class

axar averages 24 in FC which is considered to be an all rounder.

the depth in batting is world class.
 

Top