• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** Australia in India 2017

indiaholic

International Captain
Being judged by how many they miss doesn't mean they have to take every chance. But it is an okay metric if you want to compare keepers.
 

morgieb

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Australia's reviewing has been **** since the accusations. Coincidence?
I think in fairness the situation in this Test has been different, a lot of the reviews seemed to be out of desperation. We did get one overturned.
 

indiaholic

International Captain
Pujara just 61 short of facing the most balls by an Indian batsman apparently... Massive credit to his fitness..
 

adub

International Captain
well yeah if you think they should take 100% of the chances that come their way


theyre only human
A feather that would have gone to exactly the same spot it would have had he not hit it should not be dropped. Doubly so when it's just a pretty stock SLA outside off stump at around stomach height. That's a ****ing training drill.

If you're putting that **** down you're a ****** medium pace bowler, not a keeper. Should give Handscomb the gloves and Wade a couple of overs.
 

CricAddict

Cricketer Of The Year
If both Australia and SA are at full strength with their pace quartet (Steyn, Rabada, Philander, Morkel, Cummins, Haze, Patto, Starc) on a pitch assisting pace, which attack would you back to do better?
 

Top