-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
***Official*** Australia in India 2013 Short formats
- Thread starter NUFAN
- Start date
The_roc
U19 Captain
Guess it depends on how you compare an allrounder against an out and out batsman.
Kieswetter has a much better strike rate than the plodder, but a significantly lower average. He's probably got a few more catches as well.
Main difference is England have seen the light and moved on, but the Aussies keep bringing Hughesie out of retirement.
Arjun
Cricketer Of The Year
Opening bowlers struggle, but still bowling, and finally they remove both openers. Two new blokes in. Jadeja finally in.
A note about the two bowlers about whom nobody complains, and how they may be the future of India, and how India needs them so much- two matches, overs, ONE wicket for 242 runs. If the other bowlers were replaced midway through the series, these two will soon be replaced at the end of it.
A note about the two bowlers about whom nobody complains, and how they may be the future of India, and how India needs them so much- two matches, overs, ONE wicket for 242 runs. If the other bowlers were replaced midway through the series, these two will soon be replaced at the end of it.
Stapel
International Regular
Stapel
International Regular
What about an umpire that understands that ball was nowhere near the stumps. If can see it, while sipping a beer, form a few thousand miles distance, why can't he?
Stapel
International Regular
Though I sense a joke here, I think you are actually spot on, considering how Sharma is judged and/or viewed by many. When he does well, it is poor batting; when he is hit for a few, it is his poor bowling. I, for one, think Ishant cops a lot of unfair criticism.
Maybe his situation should be compared with the situation Broad (and Anderson? though he was older....) were in, a few years back. Ishant has just turned 25 years old. If India have the guts to stick with him, I think he will deliver. There's only room for improvent!
