Top_Cat
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Worse, tbh.Oh wow, well bowled Ashwin.
Curious what Henriques is made of. Is the general consensus that he's a better bat than his record suggests?
Worse, tbh.Oh wow, well bowled Ashwin.
Curious what Henriques is made of. Is the general consensus that he's a better bat than his record suggests?
It's not bad, three #9s really.That's some tail that Aus are fielding in this test. I don't remember seeing the like since 1986/87 when Greg Ritchie found himself batting in the top 6 at Melbourne iirc.
But he took poles 12 years ago.Harbahajan being useless on even this FFS and Ojha was dropped for him.
And he deserved to be dropped from the Punjab side ffs. Not picked for India.
On this wicket any half decent spinner should take wickets in the second innings. What was the point of playing 2 seamers + Jadeja anyway ?
Weakening the batting for no reason.
Definitely hitting leg imoThought that was missing leg. 10 for on though!!
Which 3 are you thinking of?It's not bad, three #9s really.
Wonder what Laxman and Dravid doing these days ? Should bring them back and drop Pujara and Kohli.But he took poles 12 years ago.
Nah don't need to ****, was out.If only someone would invent a system of some sort by which we could by more sure about LBWs....
Watson would've somehow managed to use both reviews already so no differenceIf only someone would invent a system of some sort by which we could by more sure about LBWs....
Siddle, Starc and Pattinson are all decent.Which 3 are you thinking of?
sonofabitchNah don't need to ****, was out.
Wade lover.
Is still thinking about using one I'm sure.Watson would've somehow managed to use both reviews already so no difference
India would love to have those two back surelyWonder what Laxman and Dravid doing these days ? Should bring them back and drop Pujara and Kohli.
Yeah. Sunil Gavaskar and Ravi Shastri as a all rounder opening won't be bad either.India would love to have those two back surely