Leading pointscorer in the NRL last season ffs, champion bloke.He's such a loser in general. I had a Cronulla-Souths-Canberra multi though so I'm happy.
And when Raiders play at home.Goal kicking centre. Racks up the DT points on the odd occasion he's on the park.
TBH, I do rate Clarke as a captain. Despite not having unlimited talented players Australia used to have, he's managed well, I think.Reminds me of Pup not bowling Patto in the 1st Test...which everyone on here said was due to managing Pattinson's injuries....but no, it was just another case of getting funky
Clarke offered no substantial explanation for his call to limit James Pattinson to two spells of three overs each on Australia's first bowling day of the series, despite the young fast bowler ripping out two early wickets and looking the team's most dangerous bowler by a distance at arguably its most pivotal point.
"It's just the way it goes, sometimes you bowl 15 overs straight or 21 overs straight like Nathan Lyon yesterday, sometimes you bowl short spells," Clarke said. "There was no real reason behind that."
Source
Vijay got out playing what was quite possibly the worst shot I have ever seen and I ripped into him, so Senile Sentry replied to my post saying I didn't rate him with some pretty standard warmongering asking me if I rated Warner. I replied by asking him if he rated Neil McKenzie, and then again asking if he rated Dane Tilse - being of course precisely as relevant to my post as the crap he sprouted at it.Don't even know what happened there.
loving how seamlessly siddle fits in hereAustralian batting stats for the series:
Clarke - 286 runs @ 47.6
Cowan - 265 runs @ 33.2
Smith - 161 runs @ 40.2
Warner - 195 runs @ 24.3
Hughes - 147 runs @ 18.3
Siddle - 139 runs @ 17.3
Wade - 113 runs @ 18.8
Watson - 99 runs @ 16.5
I don't see the rationale for dropping Cowan, at all.
Is tilse the tall **** that plays in the forwards for Canberra?Vijay got out playing what was quite possibly the worst shot I have ever seen and I ripped into him, so Senile Sentry replied to my post saying I didn't rate him with some pretty standard warmongering asking me if I rated Warner. I replied by asking him if he rated Neil McKenzie, and then again asking if he rated Dane Tilse - being of course precisely as relevant to my post as the crap he sprouted at it.
Yeah, real rolling in the aisles stuff.So India in Australia, 4-0 (Aus), Australia in India 4-0 (Ind). Bit of a joke that.
Haha yeah AWTA.Is tilse the tall **** that plays in the forwards for Canberra?
Has "long levers", could hit the ball miles.
career average of 33Australian batting stats for the series:
Clarke - 286 runs @ 47.6
Cowan - 265 runs @ 33.2
Smith - 161 runs @ 40.2
Warner - 195 runs @ 24.3
Hughes - 147 runs @ 18.3
Siddle - 139 runs @ 17.3
Wade - 113 runs @ 18.8
Watson - 99 runs @ 16.5
I don't see the rationale for dropping Cowan, at all.
No sir, that's just your version of the truth. I do not recollect one post from you commending Vijay for his immense patience and the runs he delivered in this series, yet you chose to cut into him the moment he had a bad innings. Yes it was a horrible shot, but you said, "This is why we don't rate him",Vijay got out playing what was quite possibly the worst shot I have ever seen and I ripped into him, so Senile Sentry replied to my post saying I didn't rate him with some pretty standard warmongering asking me if I rated Warner. I replied by asking him if he rated Neil McKenzie, and then again asking if he rated Dane Tilse - being of course precisely as relevant to my post as the crap he sprouted at it.
Yeah, real rolling in the aisles stuff.
I was referring the Vijay sceptic group on CW, most of which are actually Indian. But you decided to turn into warmongering ffs. Warner had nothing to do with my post at all.We? You are referring to yourself in the plural? Come on.