Spikey
Request Your Custom Title Now!
we say absolutely adjacent nowadays #haydosThat's as plumb as you can get
we say absolutely adjacent nowadays #haydosThat's as plumb as you can get
i don't think its ever going to happen...and say it happened it will still be trouble for the other teams as BCCI will have 3 IPL in one calender year and all worlds leading players will be playing ipl with 3 times the salary they currently gettingNot really because all the countries who'd on the one hand vote to make all matches unofficial would still line up to tour India....so I'm not sure what that'd accomplish. What would need to happen is that England, Australia, SA, SL, WI (or at leas the first three) all have to agree not to play India at all, in ODIs, Tests, etc.
Good luck with getting that to happen over something as small as UDRS.
they should ask third umpire to check for the no ball on all delivery and relive the field umpire form that....and as i understand the third umpires are supposed to check for no balls on all the delivery where a wicket as fallen rt ? so how come this was missed !!symonds has nothing to do with this that was clearly a no ball
apparently cricnfo is saying that they did check it...they should ask third umpire to check for the no ball on all delivery and relive the field umpire form that....and as i understand the third umpires are supposed to check for no balls on all the delivery where a wicket as fallen rt ? so how come this was missed !!
I really don't care that much given how poorly we've played, but how the **** is whether a foot is behind the line or not a "matter of interpretation?"apparently cricnfo is saying that they did check it...
"the thing is, they stopped him, and checked the replays, but deemed the delivery legitimate. a question of interpretation perhaps?"
Third Umpie's Labrador wasn't familiar with the rule.apparently cricnfo is saying that they did check it...
"the thing is, they stopped him, and checked the replays, but deemed the delivery legitimate. a question of interpretation perhaps?"
It can be a bit of a grey area as to exactly when you make the call of where the foot is with spinners becauseI really don't care that much given how poorly we've played, but how the **** is whether a foot is behind the line or not a "matter of interpretation?"
Haha, I had it muted. What was the response?lol @ a discussion FINALLY about Sachin not batting anywhere but 4 and forcing batting order rejigging just for that in case of injuries... Never thought Ravi would be the one to initiate that discussion too. Laxman's response was priceless