I love that reasoning.brilliant game the more deserving side won love Laxman what a man! what a player!
Hardly pathetic. Performed quite admirably and kept getting back into the match even when things weren't looking too good.**** that, ****ing pathetic Australia. Laxman was too good but Australia should of won that...I was so excited because I thought Australia was going to win in India.
****ing umpires were pathetic and I'd like to thank the BBCI as well.
Ponting's captaincy wasn't the best either it has to be said. I also don't like that some of the posters in this thread were completely writing India off, sounds like they were just doing it to do make India's victory look even better.
Congrats to India as well.
btw are you going to apologise?SS most definitely is
Not really. I said there'd be a wicket after the innings break. There was.btw are you going to apologise?
I first want an apology for the pessimistic remarks,
then I want an apology for the suggestion that I need to make an apology.
Appreciate it
I know! I know. But this is a good time to gloat. I was ****ting in my pants 10 minutes ago. Well played Australia! Better luck next time, in Ashes.blatant fanboysim
LolOk, so
Ponting - direst captain ever? Seriously... wow
North - GAGFADIAF
Hauritz - direness
Fast bowlers - awesome. They did way more than expected (defending 216 ffs!), unlucky and not backed up in field placings
Paine - one to watch for the future
Watson - gun
VVS - not human, needs to be detained by CIA and studied as an alien specimen
BCCI - ****s
What have you got against Ponting?What a game!
Punter's face was worth watching
VVS - take a bow!
I meant the session with Sharma and Laxman.Hardly pathetic. Performed quite admirably and kept getting back into the match even when things weren't looking too good.
Awesomness... woohoo.I'm dying here.
Laxman is never leaving my avatar BTW.
Things that people say in jest. Take it easyI love that reasoning.
How does one side deserve to win a game like that more than the other?
1st innings almost equal, second innings the same. Both had a bowler down at some stages (it was to India's benefit imho ) and each side had a copule of bad calls go their way.
More than Edgbaston 05, more than Adelaide 93, this was a genuine toos to the coin job rather than one side constatnly being behind the eight ball and nearly jagging it. Just a great, great test match.
lol when you analyze it on the whole it does look both deserved it equally I guess coming back from125-8 does cloud your judgement and make you the more sentimental favorite to a neutral.I love that reasoning.
How does one side deserve to win a game like that more than the other?
1st innings almost equal, second innings the same. Both had a bowler down at some stages (it was to India's benefit imho ) and each side had a copule of bad calls go their way.
More than Edgbaston 05, more than Adelaide 93, this was a genuine toos to the coin job rather than one side constatnly being behind the eight ball and nearly jagging it. Just a great, great test match.