Scaly piscine
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
That really was an awful shot from Vaughan, think I'll go find something enjoyable to do if England are gonna bat like muppets.
Please do.Scaly piscine said:That really was an awful shot from Vaughan, think I'll go find something enjoyable to do if England are gonna bat like muppets.
He was completely beaten in the flight by the drift. Can't really blame him. Tresco on the other hand didn't do that well.Scaly piscine said:That really was an awful shot from Vaughan, think I'll go find something enjoyable to do if England are gonna bat like muppets.
Yea, I'll go to Derbyshire for a bit, plenty of dumb creatures that'll take the bait there.luckyeddie said:Please do.
Go fishing - for a fortnight.
Interesting.... I had assumed it was something (a router somewhere or something) on the way to cricketweb that wasn't accepting my tcp packets - at least, that's what my ISP's service issues page said. The proxy changes my IP, and now I can visit the site. Not incredibly cluey on that stuff though. Hope it's not the nazi freaks we had the other week behind the attack, anyway.Neil Pickup said:Another DDOS attack
Well James can't access the forum, but he's asked me to post this for you guys.
"Due to another DDOS attack, some of you may experience problems accessing Cricket Web until this is resolved.
This is again being looked into by our hosts."
Hope this helps.
Err yes you can, playing against the spin, to a ball pitching the best part of a foot outside leg stump when on nought.FaaipDeOiad said:He was completely beaten in the flight by the drift. Can't really blame him. Tresco on the other hand didn't do that well.
Precisely why Warne is one of the world's greatest ever bowlers whilst Vaughan is "merely" a very good player.Scaly piscine said:Err yes you can, playing against the spin, to a ball pitching the best part of a foot outside leg stump when on nought.
PommieMacGill said:I reckon it could be a case of the Aussies ruing the fact that they didn't get 50 more runs. I think it they could have got 175-180 it would be a very close game indeed, especially with the way Warnie is bowling.
Yeah, absolutely. There's a lot of if only...'s there in the Australian innings too, mainly Clarke's brain fade before lunch and the Katich decision. I don't think 129 will be enough.PommieMacGill said:I reckon it could be a case of the Aussies ruing the fact that they didn't get 50 more runs. I think it they could have got 175-180 it would be a very close game indeed, especially with the way Warnie is bowling.
I'm with you on that one (the Vaughan bit is unnecessary - he'd get into your side's line-up).social said:Precisely why Warne is one of the world's greatest ever bowlers whilst Vaughan is "merely" a very good player.
Adamc said:Hmm. It can't happen, can it?
Just what I was thinking.Knopfler said:
Yeah, it can. I've been an English sports fan for too long to count my chickens.Adamc said:Hmm. It can't happen, can it?