• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** Australia in England 2018

Who will win the ODI series?

  • England

    Votes: 13 92.9%
  • Australia

    Votes: 1 7.1%

  • Total voters
    14
  • Poll closed .

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Finch
Warner
Khawaja/SMarsh/MMarsh/Renshaw
Smith
Lynn
Maxwell
Stoinis
Carey
Cummins
Starc
Hazlewood

could have just as much chance at the WC as any team. If they can get it together.

Even as a stop-gap, can Paine as ODI captain be justified for another series? As a batsman has shown zero capability he’s a viable option by 2018 standards and at a team level this is looking like Oz’s worst bilateral ODI series ever.
Nah Paine's finished in ODIs. They were in a position where they pretty much had to go with him for this series for the sake of continuity and rebuilding but I doubt he would have even been selected for this series as a player if not for everything that went on.
 

Top_Cat

Request Your Custom Title Now!
In fairness after the start i can understand it and sending in someone to keep it going knowing you have the form man to come. If Stoinis had hit 40 off 25 then we would all say it was a genius decision.
Yeah and if he came in and slapped the spinner to someone behind square second ball, what sort of decision would one label it?

Oh that's what happened.

It's not a poor decision because it didn't come off, it's poor because it was so goddamn much less likely to come off than not. You don't win many games with that sort of hit-and-hope bollocks.
 

flibbertyjibber

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Yeah and if he came in and slapped the spinner to someone behind square second ball, what sort of decision would one label it?

Oh that's what happened.

It's not a poor decision because it didn't come off, it's poor because it was so goddamn much less likely to come off than not. You don't win many games with that sort of hit-and-hope bollocks.
Like you lot know what winning is anyway. You were getting thumped the other way anyway so trying something different was worth it. It failed but at least it wasn't same **** different day.
 

GoodAreasShane

Cricketer Of The Year
Lynn is not the solution, personally think he shouldn't even be considered unless he can actually get through a decent amount of cricket. It isn't even like his list A stats are anything to write home about anyway
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Yeah and if he came in and slapped the spinner to someone behind square second ball, what sort of decision would one label it?

Oh that's what happened.

It's not a poor decision because it didn't come off, it's poor because it was so goddamn much less likely to come off than not. You don't win many games with that sort of hit-and-hope bollocks.
That's the only way this team is going to win a game though. Batting properly and being lucky to get to 300 clearly doesn't work. Taking dumb risks and hoping you get a defendable total might.

Lynn is not the solution, personally think he shouldn't even be considered unless he can actually get through a decent amount of cricket. It isn't even like his list A stats are anything to write home about anyway
Disagree. He's exactly the mould that is working for England on flat wickets. And his List A stats are irrelevant. You know he's hardly played a List A game for 3-4 years? A result of Australia's dumb af "play all the games in 3 weeks in Sydney" List A tournament. If you're injured you don't play One Day games that year.

edit: Agree about his fitness though. This is assuming he actually becomes fit enough to not be a complete liability in the field.
 
Last edited:

Top_Cat

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Like you lot know what winning is anyway. You were getting thumped the other way anyway so trying something different was worth it. It failed but at least it wasn't same **** different day.
That's the only way this team is going to win a game though. Batting properly and being lucky to get to 300 clearly doesn't work. Taking dumb risks and hoping you get a defendable total might.
Could not disagree any more with either of these ****s.
 

quincywagstaff

International Debutant
Finch
Warner
Khawaja/SMarsh/MMarsh/Renshaw
Smith
Lynn
Maxwell
Stoinis
Carey
Cummins
Starc
Hazlewood

could have just as much chance at the WC as any team. If they can get it together.



Nah Paine's finished in ODIs. They were in a position where they pretty much had to go with him for this series for the sake of continuity and rebuilding but I doubt he would have even been selected for this series as a player if not for everything that went on.
That squad looks good on paper but it feels like going back to the past and hoping 2015 occurs all over again.

How many players have come through and established themselves since the last WC? Hardly any. Stoinis pretty much had but this series has been a couple of steps back for them. It feels like Oz will go back to the ‘old guard’ for next year which is understandable but I doubt it will work; could turn out like Sri Lanka’s 1999 title defence where a dynamic side looked dreary and flat by the next WC.
 

91Jmay

International Coach
Finch
Warner
Khawaja/SMarsh/MMarsh/Renshaw
Smith
Lynn
Maxwell
Stoinis
Carey
Cummins
Starc
Hazlewood

could have just as much chance at the WC as any team. If they can get it together.



Nah Paine's finished in ODIs. They were in a position where they pretty much had to go with him for this series for the sake of continuity and rebuilding but I doubt he would have even been selected for this series as a player if not for everything that went on.
Batting order is behind the other top teams and 0 spin bowling could kill you on a slow, low pitch.

However those pace bowlers can win a WC on their own.
 

Top_Cat

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Decent debate about what's the worst dismissal today, though. Plenty of candidates.

a) Finch's swing batta batta swing.
b) Head's Plunkett plonk to short mid
c) Stoinis ****** Schweep
d) SMarsh Daman
e) The Paine of Suicide

Choose your poison.
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
That squad looks good on paper but it feels like going back to the past and hoping 2015 occurs all over again.

How many players have come through and established themselves since the last WC? Hardly any. Stoinis pretty much had but this series has been a couple of steps back for them. It feels like Oz will go back to the ‘old guard’ for next year which is understandable but I doubt it will work; could turn out like Sri Lanka’s 1999 title defence where a dynamic side looked dreary and flat by the next WC.
It's all about peaking at the right time. There's more than enough talent there to win the WC. The 2015 side wasn't that special. Smith just made 50-100 every game and Starc blew all the batsmen away. Maxwell and Watson were probably the only other 2 players, and maybe Faulkner as a bowler (useless with the bat), who really pulled their weight.

The rest of the team chipped in here and there but were nothing special. Finch was in **** form after 1 good game against England, Warner didn't do much except one game against Afghanistan. Haddin did nothing. Clarke was done as a player and probably shouldn't have even been in the team.

Just needs Smith to anchor and a couple of the bats to hit form at the right time, and the bowlers to fire with some consistency and we're golden. The trickiest parts will be 1) everyone being fit and 2) selectors not going full r***** and picking a stupid team.
 

Starfighter

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Decent debate about what's the worst dismissal today, though. Plenty of candidates.

a) Finch's swing batta batta swing.
b) Head's Plunkett plonk to short mid
c) Stoinis ****** Schweep
d) SMarsh Daman
e) The Paine of Suicide

Choose your poison.
There's your answer.
 

GoodAreasShane

Cricketer Of The Year
Disagree. He's exactly the mould that is working for England on flat wickets. And his List A stats are irrelevant. You know he's hardly played a List A game for 3-4 years? A result of Australia's dumb af "play all the games in 3 weeks in Sydney" List A tournament. If you're injured you don't play One Day games that year.

edit: Agree about his fitness though. This is assuming he actually becomes fit enough to not be a complete liability in the field.
Sorry, but I simply don't buy the argument that his T20 ability would automatically transfer to ODI cricket, not for a second. Do agree on the domestic one day format though
 

Top