Yeah just send an A/futures teamHe'll probably be rested anyway. Can see them playing virtually a 2nd string team.
AWTAYeah just send an A/futures team
Many of the guys in the WC squad need this tour like a hole in the head, plenty wont be around for the next WC and we're overdue for some rebuilding anyway
The lad has taken the wickets this season and if we sending our 2nd/3rd string side then what's the big deal, if nothing it would atleast prove his domestic stats are misleading.Butterworth? Classic pup.
Haha, what?! Doesn't he have 7 wickets @ over 40 this season?The lad has taken the wickets this season and if we sending our 2nd/3rd string side then what's the big deal, if nothing it would atleast prove his domestic stats are misleading.
Keep the Indian's happy? I'm sure the players will have few complaints when those IPL payments hit the bank account.Howards right but i think CA will send a 2nd;'s team and claim their resting players but it will really just be to let them goto the IPL early and keep the indians happy.
I was talking about him being the leading wicket taker in Shield cricket this season, so if he can take that many wickets in the premier format of domestic cricket then what's the harm in him giving him a go.Haha, what?! Doesn't he have 7 wickets @ over 40 this season?
Because he's a terrible One Day bowler.I was talking about him being the leading wicket taker in Shield cricket this season, so if he can take that many wickets in the premier format of domestic cricket then what's the harm in him giving him a go.
Mate, let me clear this I'm no Butterworth fan but what I'm saying is if you are good enough to top the wicket-taker list in Shield cricket which is suppossed to be the toughest format then obviously you are either a good bowler or the conditions you are bowling in FC cricket are tremendously in your favour.Because he's a terrible One Day bowler.
EDIT: What Noble One said.
Well that is extremely one-eyed. There are SO MANY bowlers in the the last thirty years who were good at one form of the game, but not another (or the other). That's cricket.Mate, let me clear this I'm no Butterworth fan but what I'm saying is if you are good enough to top the wicket-taker list in Shield cricket which is suppossed to be the toughest format then obviously you are either a good bowler or the conditions you are bowling in FC cricket are tremendously in your favour.
Also I don't think that a bowler who can bowl well with the red ball can't do the same with the white ball, all one needs to do is work on a few change ups and he should be good to go.
That's why I think likes of Copeland, Hilfenhaus, Siddle can all be pretty good LO bowlers if they work on adding a few variations to their areasnal.
Well you can put it down to lack of work ethics or desire to learn, because if you can bowl well in the longer format of the game then there is no reason why you can't do that in the LO formats as well.Well that is extremely one-eyed. There are SO MANY bowlers in the the last thirty years who were good at one form of the game, but not another (or the other). That's cricket.