• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

**Official** Asia Cup 2012

Agent Nationaux

International Coach
@ Fusion. Gul is really crap. He gets carted around with the new ball and then does a little better with the old ball, but not by much. He has lost his Yorker ability as well. He just isn't cut out to be a leader of the attack.

And Cheema gets Shakib.
 

benchmark00

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Gah, needed Shakkers to be there with only about 20 to get. Too much to do now.

Might be just my perception, but I feel Shakib does this alot. Gets them on the track to victory with a good knock, then gets out when there's work still left to be done.
 

Fusion

Global Moderator
@ Fusion. Gul is really crap. He gets carted around with the new ball and then does a little better with the old ball, but not by much. He has lost his Yorker ability as well. He just isn't cut out to be a leader of the attack.

And Cheema gets Shakib.
I get all that, but have Cheema/Azam been any better?
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
I get all that, but have Cheema/Azam been any better?
Hammad Azam, at this stage of his career anyway, is a batsman who can bowl a little bit. Probably shouldn't even bowl every game, and doesn't tbf. The question is whether he's a good enough batsman to make this side on the strength of it alone, and while he does look like a very promising bat I'd be leaning towards 'no' at this stage.
 

Top