Starfighter
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Dammit. I thought that had gone for a moment.
lose to win!Um how does being bowled out for fewer give them a better chance of winning? Did Chappell actually say that? Surely I'm going insane hefe
I assume he's thinking of the amount of time left.Um how does being bowled out for fewer give them a better chance of winning? Did Chappell actually say that? Surely I'm going insane hefe
Right, that wasn't one of those horrible legside pies, that was a just a length ball that he tried to hit over fine leg for six.Ridiculous. It was actually not that short and it was wide of off stump.
I hate this short **** at Broad, but if he's gonna get out like that it isn't going to stop anytime soon.
Still makes no sense.I assume he's thinking of the amount of time left.
And no, I don't thinks it's enough either.
But it's the only reason I can think of why he'd say that, so we're stuck with it.Still makes no sense.
Yeah it's tough to say. If the pitch plays as some fear, this could be waaaaay below par, but England could also get a 150 run lead due to scoreboard pressure.It's one of those totals that's hard to say whether it's par or below or above. I think England will bowl well here and take a first innings lead.
Nah he's actually got a good point. If they made 600 or something, firstly there's less time in the game to go for a win, and secondly their less likely to get Australia to declare and push for a second innings chase.Um how does being bowled out for fewer give them a better chance of winning? Did Chappell actually say that? Surely I'm going insane hefe