NotMcKenzie
International Debutant
Knowing our selectors, 0/125, 1/90, and 5 and 6 with the bat.What figures does Marsh need to take to justify his selection?
Knowing our selectors, 0/125, 1/90, and 5 and 6 with the bat.What figures does Marsh need to take to justify his selection?
too late. they said the stats showed they needed a 5th bowler (or some rubbish) which means Marsh's performance, good or bad, doesn't matter. they've already justified it to themselvesWhat figures does Marsh need to take to justify his selection?
Not ike him to do something at a superfluous moment.Marsh is getting some real late swing (after the ball is past the bat).
It's true though. If you go all in pre flop with A,A then lose to a 3,8, it's still a good selectiontoo late. they said the stats showed they needed a 5th bowler (or some rubbish) which means Marsh's performance, good or bad, doesn't matter. they've already justified it to themselves
Nah, this was the selectors holding their aces against the 3,8 when the flop came up triple 8s.It's true though. If you go all in pre flop with A,A then lose to a 3,8, it's still a good selection
I live being proved wrong and exposing myself as the **** cricket analyst that I am. But I am genuinely happy I'm wrong this time.England to be all out for 260 and won't be able to take 10 first innings wickets. Will quote this in a couple of days.
I have commentary disabled, but for some reason I still got that bit. Not impressed.god that analysis sucked