well if England didn't have allt he injury woes since the Ashes & had gone intot the Ashes at full-strenght things could have been different at this stage. But then again one could argue that since England weren't at full-strenght he should have changed England's game plan.Nnanden said:I seriously think Fletcher is most to blame for the English. He`s living on past glory, and can not admit it when he`s wrong. He tried to mimic the 2005 campaign, when this is a very different series.
why do you think so? i think australia would've won comprehensively no matter where it would've been played...they are just that much better any way you look at it, man for man, as a team...Slow Love™ said:To be fair though, if this were played in England, I'm sure things would have been different.
No way, with Australia likely to be without most the greats come 2009, i think for sure we will be seeing home advantage being a huge factor in deciding future outcomes.adharcric said:Let's just hope we're not heading back to the days of one-sided Ashes tours.
Arrgh missed it, is it still on?Jono said:LOL @ this Ashes special thing on 9.
They're in the Aussies' change room and they're all drinking Coronas. Except Warney, he's sticking with the VB.
What`s up with the Coronas? Laaame.Jono said:LOL @ this Ashes special thing on 9.
They're in the Aussies' change room and they're all drinking Coronas. Except Warney, he's sticking with the VB.